Taking the Whole Thing Personally
December 30, 2016
The Morning Heresy is your daily digest of news and links relevant to the secular and skeptic communities.
2016 isn't done with us yet. In fact, on top of the leap day it already got, just to stretch our existential angst out a wee bit more, it's going to tack on one additional leap second. Cruel.
Scott Adams, creator of the Dilbert comic strip and therefore an expert on everything apparently, issues a bad-faith "climate science challenge," asking for a scientist to assert the credibility of climate prediction models. Angela Chen at The Verge explains what the game is:
If you’re a climate change denier, your best strategy is to pick on the models and get technical with details because after all, of course no model can get everything right all of the time. At that point, it’d be clairvoyance, not predictive modeling. It’s like if you predicted eight out of 10 things correctly, and then someone says that since you got one wrong, your entire method was trash.
Picking on the models suggests that Adams isn’t looking to be convinced, he’s just trying to bait the scientific establishment. People aren’t going to take the time to seriously answer your question if they suspect doing so will be a waste of time. Some people are tweeting explanations of climate change at Adams, but none of that is working, of course.
Is Adam ruining Adam Ruins Everything? Sean O'Kane shows how Adam Conover is fudging facts about electric cars in order to make some ironic point.
Greg Laden checks to see if 2016 really is killing more celebrities than other years, and thinks not. But you see what I did there? I just ascribed agency to 2016, as though the year itself were killing people. I am bad.
GUYS. A bunch of priests says the world NEEDS more exorcists!
“We’re in a fight with drugs, the occult, pornography,” [Rev. Vincent Lampert] explained. “This is an entry point for evil and we need to take these souls back.” Valter Cascioli, the psychologist and scientific consultant for the exorcists’ association, agreed demons across the world have multiplied and there aren’t enough priests to fight them.
A New Jersey Cub Scouts chapter kicks out an 8-year-old transgender boy. I guess they think the important thing is to make 'em feel alienated and unwanted while they're young.
Kelsey Dallas at The Deseret News surveys the state of religious freedom in the former Soviet Union.
Some members of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir are refusing to perform at the Trump inauguration, and there's a petition going around to that effect. As one signatory said, “Ted Nugent and the choir? I don’t think so!”
But there will certainly be clerical representation at the inauguration:
The inaugural committee told The Post on Wednesday that Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the Rev. Franklin Graham, Rabbi Marvin Hier, Bishop Wayne T. Jackson, the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez and Pastor Paula White will all give readings at the ceremony.
Baba Brinkman and Greydon Square do a song together: "Neighborhood Atheism."
Scott Gavura rounds up some crap allergy and asthma alt-med treatments.
At Quora, Stanford oncologist David Chan shows how you can tell alt-med cancer treatments don't work:
Wouldn’t there be a huge incentive for the payers to provide the least expensive effective treatment possible? Of course. High dose vitamin C infusions combined with Japanese mushroom extracts and the Gerson diet would all together cost a fraction of a percent of the cost of surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation therapy. But that isn’t happening and that the national health services (most of which are operating well over budget) aren’t even investing in the research should tell you all you need to know.
Gretta Vosper, the atheist minister who is in a muddle with the United Church of Canada, is helping found a Toronto chapter for the Oasis Network.
Relatedly, Mark Oppenheimer at NYT profiles Bart Campolo, the former evangelical who now preaches atheologically:
Campolo decided that there was no reason an atheist couldn’t still be a minister too. Instead of comforting people with the good news of Jesus, he’d preach secular humanism, a kinder cousin of atheism. He’d help them accept that we’re all going to die, that this life is all there is and that therefore we have to make the most of our brief, glorious time on earth. And he would spread this message using the best evangelical techniques — the same ones he had mastered as a Christian.
Eric Berger at Ars Technica EXPOSES all the things that NASA hid from the PEOPLE in 2016.
Cyril DeGrasse Tyson, father of Neil, passes away at the age of 89. Our sincere condolences to his family for their loss.
Quote of the Day:
Erin Brodwin at Business Insider looks to an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation for allegorical wisdom and perspective on the topic of climate change and fossil fuel dependence, as the crew realizes that warp drives are not entirely benign:
"Maybe I was taking the whole thing personally. Maybe I was a little threatened, the thought that warp engines might be doing some kind of damage," Geordi La Forge, the chief engineer, says. ...
Finally, the Enterprise sends its report, which concludes that warp drive is harmful, to the Federation Council. The agency responds by announcing strict policies limiting the use of warp drive except for specific situations in which it is necessary. At the end of the episode, Captain Picard says he feels partially responsible for using warp drive even though he wasn't aware of the damage it was doing.
"I've charted new worlds. I've met dozens of new species. I believed that these were all valuable ends in themselves," Picard says. "And now it seems that all this while I was helping to damage the thing that I hold most dear."
Photo credit: dno1967b via Foter.com / CC BY
Linking to a story or webpage does not imply endorsement by Paul or CFI. Not every use of quotation marks is ironic or sarcastic, but it often is.
Follow CFI on Twitter: @center4inquiry
News items that mention political candidates are for informational purposes only and under no circumstances are to be interpreted as statements of endorsement or opposition to any political candidate. CFI is a nonpartisan nonprofit.
The Morning Heresy: "I actually read it." - Hemant Mehta
#1 Dennis (Guest) on Friday December 30, 2016 at 9:18am
Speaking of Paula White:
#2 dmbierlein on Friday December 30, 2016 at 9:20am
#3 Thomas B (Guest) on Tuesday January 03, 2017 at 7:48am
If you watch “Adam Ruins Everything” regularly, you know that “fudging facts” is sort of his thing. He does it all the time. The show is entertainment. You’re still supposed to take his conclusions with a grain of salt.
#4 Thomas B (Guest) on Tuesday January 03, 2017 at 7:54am
It’s nice to recall the Star Trek episode “Force of Nature”, but the really depressing thing to me is the realization that we KNEW that climate change was coming all those years ago when that episode was written, and our government is still dragging its feet.
#5 nash984954 (Guest) on Tuesday January 03, 2017 at 4:14pm
Wow, I would have thought the reaming by potholer54,Peter Hadfield on youtube over the expanding earth would’ve cowered Adams back into his lair of stupid and ignorant, but not so, apparently. Stupid is, is stupid does. Adams head bubble, ‘hmm, No clue about this part of science, so, think I’ll try a hand at another part I equally don’t understand except I just oppose it, maybe they’ll not notice’.
Oh my I just learned from Thomas B above #3 and #4 how common he gets it wrong, I had no idea, but suspected. Thanks Tom. ‘Adams ruins everything’, good title too. I gotta tell Peter, maybe he didn’t now either.
#6 nash984954 (Guest) on Tuesday January 03, 2017 at 4:47pm
Previous post, huge overstatement, okay, made a big mistake, there’s 2 clueless artwork Adams’s
Neal Adams AND a Scott Adams.
DC comics artist Neal’s expanding earth is here:
#7 9849854 on Tuesday January 03, 2017 at 5:09pm
About the link to potholer54 video commented by nash984954,me, it’s here:
Neal Adams dc comic artist thought earth was expanding and is similar(credibility wise) to this Scott Adams guy.
#8 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:22am
“all this while I was helping to damage the thing that I hold most dear”
The universe dies in the end anyway. At some point, either we will go extinct, or we will have to deal with that reality.
What ever happened after “Force of Nature”? I remember it, and yet things seemed to keep going on as usual. Deep Space Nine, Voyager, First Contact, Nemesis, Insurrection…. I don’t remember any restriction on warp drive in those. They probably fixed it with tachyons.
#9 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:27am
Scott Adams is a credible man. He predicted the Trump win early. And look who is being inaugurated.
Disagreeing with someone politically doesn’t mean they are somehow lacking.
#10 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:30am
“... will all give readings at the ceremony”
The nightmare begins.
#11 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:35am
2016 may not have killed more celebrities, but it did kill more loved celebrities, due to the timing of how global celebrity became a thing, how the ease of fan recording could augment celebrity success, how we’ve become increasing close to celebrities via social media, and also the way the fans of these celebrities are more connected now than before.
2017 is going to be worse.
#12 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:42am
“no model can get everything right all of the time”
Well, I guess we just lucked out with all those trips to the moon, right where we said it would be, and all those probes to the planets, too. Better not push our luck though…
We really need a better answer than that.
#13 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:44am
“Some people are tweeting explanations”
These words really never belong together…
#14 Randy (Guest) on Tuesday January 10, 2017 at 1:49am
When it comes to bad faith, how can I take an article on climate change seriously when it starts with an attack on someone’s political beliefs?
In any case, the Verge article is a dodge. This is the question that scientists have to answer, because this is the question that voters have.
You may not like it, but you do have to deal with it.