Charles Darwin and his Father Debunk Spiritualists and Psychics

January 21, 2010

Share this:

Charles Darwin is of course best known for developing the theory of evolution and writing On the Origin of Species . But he and his father were scientists and skeptics to the core.

In a letter dated March 19, Darwin had written of the gullibility of physician James Manby Gully, who had treated Darwin's father: "Dr. Gully was a spiritualist & believer in clairvoyance. He bothered my father for some time to have a consultation with a clairvoyant, who was staying at Malvern, and was reputed to be able to see the insides of people & discover the real nature of their ailments."

Darwin's father finally agreed to meet with the self-proclaimed psychic who had so impressed the gullible Dr. Gully. But, he insisted, he wanted to test the psychic's power for himself. "Accordingly, in going to the interview he put a banknote in a sealed envelope. After being introduced to the lady he said 'I have heard a great deal of your powers of reading concealed writings & I should like to have evidence myself: now in this envelope there is a banknote—if you will read the number I shall be happy to present it to you.'" It was a very simple test: if the psychic could see through a patient's clothing and flesh to diagnose diseases, surely she could see through a simple, paper-thin envelope and determine the denomination of a bank note.

The psychic refused, saying she was insulted at being asked to prove her amazing abilities: "The clairvoyante answered scornfully 'I have a maid-servant at home who can do that.'" Though she couldn't use her powers to read the contents of an envelope, she proceeded to do her "medical intuitive" act.

Comments:

#1 Aydin (Guest) on Thursday January 21, 2010 at 3:52pm

Any idea how many different denominations of banknotes they had in England back then? It would be risky to run a test like this in the U.S. With only 6 common denominations of paper money, a person’s chances of guessing the value of a hidden bill would be 1 out of 6.

#2 Peter Brand (Guest) on Sunday February 07, 2010 at 11:48pm

I think he meant for her to read the serial number.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.