Avatar: A Critical View (Through 3D Glasses)

January 28, 2010

This much-ballyhooed show does indeed provide a strong cinematic experience. Apart from the 3D and powerful, beyond-cutting-edge special effects—and despite characters and plot that (observes one critic) “rarely rise above 1D” (see Andrew Jack on culturekiosk.com )— Avatar takes us into the future for an illuminating view of our sometimes ignominious past.

In this through-the-looking-glass view, Earthlings are the futuristic aliens on Pandora, the moon of a planet, 4.3 light years away, called Polyphemus. They are on a mission to mine Unobtainium, a mineral which is the answer to Earth’s energy crisis. As fate would have it, the largest deposit is located beneath the great Hometree which is sacred to the inhabitants.

Called Na’vi, these are humanoids—blue-skinned and tailed, to be sure, but modeled after ourselves nonetheless (like most of our fantasy beings: gods, devils, angels, Sasquatches, and our own Earth-visiting extraterrestrials). The aboriginal Na’vi are armed with bows and arrows and ride on horselike animals or on great flying creatures called Mountain Banshees—all of which they are in life-energy contact with.

The Earthlings, known to the Na’vi as the Sky People, operate from a military base. There, Colonel Miles Quaritch (Steven Lang) and his soldiers seem, despite all their futuristic paraphernalia and contraptions, to still embody the old mentality of Earth’s militarists, who have sometimes engaged in ruthlessly slaughtering their brethren: the native peoples of America, Africa, Vietnam, and elsewhere. A few of the Earthlings have avatars, genetically engineered human-Na’vi hybrids into which their consciousness can be transferred. One such is Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a paraplegic veteran whose avatar-self is wheelchair-free; he is sent on a mission to gather intel from the Na’vi.

As it happens, Jake not only becomes accepted by the Na’vi but chooses as his mate Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), the daughter of the king and queen. When the information he has provided leads to an attack from giant bulldozers, Jake tries to stop the assault. He fails, but chooses to defend the Na’vi against the onslaught. He is joined by the avatar project’s scientific director, Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver), and a handful of others.

The stage is set for war between the Sky People, who attack with a great bombship flanked by helicopter-like craft, and the Na’vi, whose many clans join together in defense of their world. I will leave the ending for viewers to see, but let me sum up. To the extent that Avatar derives from our own paranormal myths—of alien hybrids, fantasy creatures, and New Age beliefs, including the supposed life-energy interconnectedness of all living things—it is just more silliness. On the other hand, a movie that disparages imperialistic wars and environmental abuse can’t be all bad—and did I mention the 3D and wonderful special effects, all of whjch make Avatar well worth seeing.


#1 Jim (Guest) on Thursday January 28, 2010 at 10:30pm

This review was not very well-written. You should probably have skipped the four middle paragraphs of plot summary and focused more on the critique.

#2 Arno (Guest) on Friday January 29, 2010 at 9:41am

I agree that Avatar is well worth seeing for the spectacular 3D effects. But I expected you as a scientist and skeptic to concentrate more on the horrible science portrayed in the movie. The biology made no sense. The physics made no sense. The avatar process made no sense. The Na’vi military tactics made no sense. I have not seen any review address these topics; I wish someone would.

#3 Kathy Orlinsky on Friday January 29, 2010 at 11:54am


Here are a couple of reviews that might cover what you’re looking for:

I agree that a lot of it made no sense.  For example, why did all the animal life on Pandora have six limbs, but the Na’vi had only four?  They should have looked more like the characters from Antz.

#4 Alex (Guest) (Guest) on Friday January 29, 2010 at 7:05pm

Arno, hate to be the one to say this, but if you want a critique to concentrate on those specific areas, why don’t you write it. You’ve found a niche that you may be uniquely qualified to fill. No sarcasm intended.

#5 Max (Guest) on Monday February 01, 2010 at 2:52am

Avatar is as original as a five-assed monkey. The giant smurfs ride giant smurf horses that have SIX legs, whoa! The helicopters have tandem coaxial rotors. If they’re already tandem, what’s the point of making them coaxial? And the protective rings around the rotors are just extra weight, unless they planned to bump into walls.
But retarded technology isn’t nearly as irritating as retarded characters.
The theme is the old alien invasion, only with the sides swapped.
And the graphics are very video-gamish.
I think James Cameron doesn’t respect his audience.

#6 gray1 on Monday February 22, 2010 at 7:03pm

Three words; money, money, money.  The show is a big winner, so critics must fawn, not yawn if they expect to remain creditable.  Yes, the science is wrong and even trite (as so the messages) but spectacular imagery heals all.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.