Evolution in Writing
January 20, 2010
A decline in the use and quality of handwriting is being reported as students increasingly work on computers. (See Tom Breen’s AP article, “Some fear technology is erasing need for students to learn cursive,” Buffalo News , Sept. 21, 2009.)
During the centuries-long pen-and-ink era, good penmanship was a saleable commodity. Then it largely began to be replaced by typing ability with the advent of the typewriter. And now it is computer skills that are being sought—at the expense of cursive writing. In 2011, eighth- and ninth-graders will be required to compose on computers for the writing test of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Fourth-graders will follow in 2019. Stated the president of the Whole Language Umbrella (a conference of the National Council of Teachers of English), “We need to make sure they’ll be ready for what’s going to happen in 2020 or 2030.”
I sense that is to be, in part, a self-fulfilling prophecy. It certainly gives pause to this calligrapher and handwriting expert (who is called upon to examine questioned historical documents, like the Jack the Ripper Diary). I share the concern of a mother whose eighth-grade daughter could scarcely sign her name: “It looks like a little kid’s signature,” she laments. That is not surprising when the largest school system in her state (West Virginia) teaches cursive only in the third grade.
I’m trying to think positively: One bright note may be the consequent decline in graphology, the pseudoscience of handwriting “analysis.” Most forensic handwriting experts distance themselves from graphology, which purports to divine character traits from certain penned elements (such as the height of one’s t -bars). Unfortunately, graphology lacks a suitable experimental foundation, in part because of the difficulty of measuring such vague traits as “generosity” (whether overt or “latent”). (For a discussion, see my Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents , 1996, pp. 17–24. See also Martin Gardner, Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science , 1957, 196–197.)
I’m an optimist. We’ve lost the fine art of writing hieroglyphics with a reed pen on papyrus, but we also no longer spend much time attempting divination from the entrails of sheep. Once again, things may be looking up.
#1 Kathy Orlinsky on Wednesday January 20, 2010 at 4:15pm
I don’t mourn the loss of handwriting skills, especially for children.
I personally know kids who have written multipage long stories on the computer at ages when they would barely have a managed a paragraph if they’d had to do it with a pencil. And after all, isn’t communication rather than style the point of writing?
#2 Yojimbo on Thursday January 21, 2010 at 10:37am
It is akin to using a calculator for math. When they first appeared there was a lot of concern that kids would lose basic arithmatic skills. But a calculator cannot give a correct answer if the user doesn’t understand how to enter the problem. Likewise, using words clearly does not depend on the chosen tool.
#3 J. Wood (Guest) on Thursday January 28, 2010 at 10:52am
You swine! First handwriting goes, and then the next thing you know there won’t even be books anymore - no page turning, no smell of fresh print, no sweat stained book covers. . . It’s a shame when you think 8th graders can hardly sign their own name. . .
Only one year of cursive and handwriting is just sad, but the notion that our schools are failing at their task is not surprising at all.