<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   
    <channel>
<atom:link href="http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blogs/rss/alanzoppa" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <title>Center for Inquiry |  Blog entries by Alan Zoppa</title>
    <link>http://www.centerforinquiry.net/</link>
    <description> with Alan Zoppa</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2012</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-02-09T15:47:26+00:00</dc:date>
    

    <item>
      <title>McCain&#8217;s &amp;ldquo;Internet Freedom Act&amp;rdquo; Promotes Anything But</title>
	<author>Alan Zoppa</author>
      <link>http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blog/mccains_internet_freedom_act_promotes_anything_but/</link>
      <guid>http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blog/mccains_internet_freedom_act_promotes_anything_but/#When:15:44Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[ 
        


			<p>
 Yesterday,
 <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/102209-mccain-introduces-bill-to-block.html?source=NWWNLE_nlt_daily_pm_2009-10-22">
  Senator John McCain (R-AZ) introduced a bill
 </a>
 that would allow Internet service providers to throttle or block content and applications as they see fit. This is an attempt to prevent the &ldquo;Net Neutrality&rdquo; you&rsquo;ve likely heard about, which McCain dismisses as a &ldquo;government takeover&rdquo; of the internet.
</p>
<p>
 McCain, who is just
 <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/2403704/John-McCain-technology-illiterate-doesnt-email-or-use-internet.html">
  &ldquo;learning to get online [him]self,&rdquo;
 </a>
 introduced the legislation on the same day that the
 <acronym title="Federal Communications Commision">
  FCC
 </acronym>
 decided to move forward on an official Net Neutrality policy. This bill would prevent that.
</p>
<p>
 If Net Neutrality isn't ensured, telcos may soon be able to block certain websites entirely, or sell content providers faster, &lsquo;premium&rsquo; access to their customers. As for the probable results of
 <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/att_lobbyist_asks_employees_th.html">
  letting the foxes administer the henhouse,
 </a>
 Craigslist founder Craig Newmark
 <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/09/newmark.internet/index.html">
  put it better than I can:
 </a>
</p>
<blockquote>
 <p>
  &ldquo;Here&rsquo;s a real world example that shows how this would work. Let&rsquo;s say you call Joe&rsquo;s Pizza and the first thing you hear is a message saying you&rsquo;ll be connected in a minute or two, but if you want, you can be connected to Pizza Hut right away. That&rsquo;s not fair, right? You called Joe&rsquo;s and want some Joe&rsquo;s pizza. Well, that&rsquo;s how some telecommunications executives want the Internet to operate, with some Web sites easier to access than others. For them, this would be a money-making regime.&rdquo;
 </p>
</blockquote>
<p>
 To paraphrase
 <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/may/19/we-must-ensure-google-garage">
  Cory Doctorow
 </a>
 in a lecture I don&rsquo;t care to track down, this, for the consumer, has all the dignity of being traded to another prisoner for a pack of cigarettes. Between Time Warner and AT&amp;T mobile, I shell out nearly $80/month for internet access. For this, I expect the content I want, delivered at the fastest speed the network can manage. I have no interest in becoming fungible currency in an racket to demand higher fees from content providers. I want the Internet I grew up with&mdash; the one that&rsquo;s free as in freedom and
 <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/free_as_in_beer">
  free as in beer
 </a>
 .
</p>
<p>
 For the moment, we at CFI don&rsquo;t need to worry about your
 <acronym title="Internet Service Provider">
  ISP
 </acronym>
 &rsquo;s opinions or interests before posting anything we like on our various web properties. If Senator McCain has his way, that may change. I encourage you all to sign the petition and contact your legislators at
 <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/">
  savetheinternet.com
 </a>
 .
</p>
<p>
 <em>
  <strong>
   Disclaimer:
  </strong>
  CFI does not have an official position on this legislation. As with all entries on
  <cite>
   Free Thinking
  </cite>
  , the opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily of CFI. This call to action is a personal plea from a developer who has benefited from a free and open internet.
 </em>
</p>
	<p class="link"><a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com
">&#123;link&#125;</a></p>


      
      ]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-10-23T15:44+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


</channel>

</rss>
