RobertScorpio wrote:
DS9 vs TNG
Again we don’t agree. I don’t think TNG is aging well at all. And I think DS9s more complex story writing is holding up quite well. And for whatever reason, it seems to me that the fans of TREK prefer TNG over DS9. Poll after poll shows this to be true.
TNG is more vanilla, thus more appealing to the masses. But ratings success can not be the final say. Because, as I have mentioned elswhere, Baywatch got higher ratings than TNG. So does that make Baywatch the better show? I hope not.
And it must also be pointed out that TNG came around with very little other choices to watch in terms of first run sydication and network scif. DS9 had to deal with SEAQUEST..BABYLON 5..Stargate.., not to mention TNG, and far more sydicated competition.
TNG, to me, never had really deep character growth. It has some, but not as much as DS9. DS9 is great because everyone, from Sisko to Nog, grew in ways no one could have predict. When you can’t predict where a show is going, I think it mirrors reality.
TNG may garner all the numbers and get all the hoopla. But for me? DS9 was a labor of love for the fans of TREK who were ready for more than just retreaded, but improved TOS.
DWF wrote:
TNG has continued to gain new fans ans stay on the air every since it first started in 1987 DS9 OTOH was beiing cut off the air before their final seasons in some markets during their original run and it’s future on Spike is shakey as well.
DS9’s storylines and characters aren’t attracting people the way TNG has continued to do over the years. I’m sorry but DS9 was that much of a standout show it would’ve been that way when it originally aired but they trouble beating the other shows in the ratings and creatively as well.
I don’t see the “vanilla” complaint myself especially seeing as how the attempts to surpass TNG with the other shows seems to have fallen flat over the years. But then I nver did think that DS9 was all that great and Voyager and Enterprise is all that bad.
TheMasterOfOrion wrote:
Enterprise could have been a great show but it wasn’t executed very well. DS9 had some great actors and great episodes but I don’t really consider it Trek. It was the black sheep of the family, spent too much time de-constructing Roddenberry, it had too much religion, too much soap and frankly I think Babylon-5 did the story telling better.
http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?p=1367596
http://ds9tng.ytmnd.com/
I think whether someone prefers DS9 over TNG or vice versa says more about their personalities then it does about the shows. DS9 was a very different Star Trek. I have seen a reviewer who says it wasn’t even Star Trek. If I were to go that far I would even say that is why I like it so much. The self righteous goody two shoes attitude of TNG made me want to puke sometimes. I wanted to shoot Picard in the head at the end of The Pegasus episode. But sometimes he was really cool as in Starship Mine but I suppose that is an inevitable result of having a lot of different writers. But I am a sci-fi fan not a Star Trek fan and I got into sci-fi before TOS came on the air. Plenty of the original Outer Limits episodes were better than Star Trek but they had that darker aspect of reality that shows up in DS9 also.
psik