8 of 10
8
Osama Bin Laden 1957-2011 (Merged)
Posted: 14 May 2011 04:09 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 106 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2714
Joined  2011-04-24
citizenschallenge.pm - 13 May 2011 11:48 PM

EXTRA * EXTRA * EXTRA
READ ALL ABOUT IT

Bin Laden needed porn to get it up…

yahoo.com news , AP Intelligence Writer Kimberly Dozier
AP Sources: Porn stash found at bin Laden compound

WASHINGTON – A sizeable stash of pornography was among the items seized when U.S. Navy SEALs raided the Pakistani hideout of Osama bin Laden, almost two weeks ago, U.S. officials say.

The officials said it was unclear who the material belonged to, and there was no way to know whether bin Laden had viewed it.*

{yea right and you never rifled your daddy’s dresser drawers… or visa versa }  tongue rolleye

The great Islamic hope   LOL LOL
just another frustrated religious freak
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

*Maybe they can do DNA tests LOL LOL

Are they going to withhold those pics from the public question  red face Its a total non-issue if he had porno.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 04:44 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 107 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1071
Joined  2007-06-20
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 04:09 AM

Are they going to withhold those pics from the public question  red face

If they involve goats or donkeys (which wouldn’t surprise me!), then I hope like hell they withhold them!  LOL

mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 04:09 AM

Its a total non-issue if he had porno.

I disagree. 

It goes to the heart of his hypocrisy.  It is just like when Republican Senator Larry Craig was arrested in the men’s room for lewd behavior with a man.  With almost anyone else that would be a non-issue.  But since Craig used his position to deny gays rights, his hypocrisy on this issue is newsworthy.  Or when anti-drug Rush Limbaugh got hooked on drugs.  If it hadn’t been for his previous strong position on the subject, then that would have been a non-issue.

Likewise how the 9/11 hijackers boozed it up with strippers right before their attacks shows their utter hypocrisy.  They (and bin Laden) are more than willing to kill thousands of unarmed civilians just because those people don’t follow bin Laden’s strict, barbaric and primitive 7th Century anti-porn, anti-stripper and anti-alcohol brand of Islam.  Yet all the while these people are engaging in the very activities they want to forcibly deny others.  That’s an issue!

When it comes to religion, I think the most whacked-out vocal opponents of something are usually the ones engaging in it themselves!  That doesn’t matter if the religion is Christianity preaching against gays (Do you hear me Fred Phelps!  Just come out of the closet already!) or if it is Islam preaching against women (or goats or donkeys) showing the tiniest bit of skin.  In the end they all secretly desire it themselves.  And that’s an important issue.

[ Edited: 14 May 2011 04:46 AM by Rocinante ]
 Signature 

There are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by the gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation.

—James Madison

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 06:12 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 108 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2714
Joined  2011-04-24
Rocinante - 14 May 2011 04:44 AM
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 04:09 AM

Are they going to withhold those pics from the public question  red face

If they involve goats or donkeys (which wouldn’t surprise me!), then I hope like hell they withhold them!  LOL

mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 04:09 AM

Its a total non-issue if he had porno.

I disagree. 

It goes to the heart of his hypocrisy.  It is just like when Republican Senator Larry Craig was arrested in the men’s room for lewd behavior with a man.  With almost anyone else that would be a non-issue.  But since Craig used his position to deny gays rights, his hypocrisy on this issue is newsworthy.  Or when anti-drug Rush Limbaugh got hooked on drugs.  If it hadn’t been for his previous strong position on the subject, then that would have been a non-issue.

Likewise how the 9/11 hijackers boozed it up with strippers right before their attacks shows their utter hypocrisy.  They (and bin Laden) are more than willing to kill thousands of unarmed civilians just because those people don’t follow bin Laden’s strict, barbaric and primitive 7th Century anti-porn, anti-stripper and anti-alcohol brand of Islam.  Yet all the while these people are engaging in the very activities they want to forcibly deny others.  That’s an issue!

When it comes to religion, I think the most whacked-out vocal opponents of something are usually the ones engaging in it themselves!  That doesn’t matter if the religion is Christianity preaching against gays (Do you hear me Fred Phelps!  Just come out of the closet already!) or if it is Islam preaching against women (or goats or donkeys) showing the tiniest bit of skin.  In the end they all secretly desire it themselves.  And that’s an important issue.

True enough,its human nature 101;screaming loud to cover up your own perversions LOL I ment it was a non issue because the media often seems like they try to show some moral high ground B.S. in saying these things,kind of like saying that Bin Ladin,not only was he a mass murderer and maniac,he was also a chronic masturbater! Im being a wiseass about it,however the hypocrisy is blatent like you said.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 04:47 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 109 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7684
Joined  2008-04-11
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 04:09 AM

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
*Maybe they can do DNA tests LOL LOL

Are they going to withhold those pics from the public question  red face Its a total non-issue if he had porno.

But it IS an issue. If the sharia thugs catch Mo Shmow with pornography, they will be beaten and put to death. However, when the high ranking officers are captured, it is not unusual to find a stash of porn along with them. You know, sort of like the ‘family first’ GOP demanding Clinton’s resignation because of an affair with Lewinski, while carrying their own illicit liaisons.

edited to add a {quote} symbol.

[ Edited: 14 May 2011 10:55 PM by Occam. ]
 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 05:40 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 110 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2714
Joined  2011-04-24
asanta - 14 May 2011 04:47 PM
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 04:09 AM

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
*Maybe they can do DNA tests LOL LOL

Are they going to withhold those pics from the public question  red face Its a total non-issue if he had porno.

But it IS an issue. If the sharia thugs catch Mo Shmow with pornography, they will be beaten and put to death. However, when the high ranking officers are captured, it is not unusual to find a stash of porn along with them. You know, sort of like the ‘family first’ GOP demanding Clinton’s resignation because of an affair with Lewinski, while carrying their own illicit liaisons.

Yes its an issue for the people in that society,but I was thinking about the American public’s attitude toward the whole situation.We dont need to worry about it,him having porn doesnt really change the ethical status of anything.

edited to correct {quote} symbols.[/]

[ Edited: 14 May 2011 10:57 PM by Occam. ]
 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 08:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 111 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1071
Joined  2007-06-20
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 05:40 PM

him having porn doesnt really change the ethical status of anything.

It just icing on the schadenfreude!  grin

 Signature 

There are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by the gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation.

—James Madison

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 11:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 112 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7684
Joined  2008-04-11
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 05:40 PM

]Yes its an issue for the people in that society,but I was thinking about the American public’s attitude toward the whole situation.We dont need to worry about it,him having porn doesnt really change the ethical status of anything.

Aside from the fundies, Americans don’t care, and the muslims believe it is a part of a smear campaign against their martyr, even if they know it is true..

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 11:31 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 113 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2714
Joined  2011-04-24
Rocinante - 14 May 2011 08:58 PM
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 05:40 PM

him having porn doesnt really change the ethical status of anything.

It just icing on the schadenfreude!  grin

That’s the point in a funny way.Its media nonsense to make people pay more attention.Makes some moralizers feel more righteous.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 May 2011 11:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 114 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2714
Joined  2011-04-24
asanta - 14 May 2011 11:01 PM
mid atlantic - 14 May 2011 05:40 PM

]Yes its an issue for the people in that society,but I was thinking about the American public’s attitude toward the whole situation.We dont need to worry about it,him having porn doesnt really change the ethical status of anything.

Aside from the fundies, Americans don’t care, and the muslims believe it is a part of a smear campaign against their martyr, even if they know it is true..

It probably is a smear campaign against him in a way!

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 12:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 115 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4400
Joined  2010-08-15
Rocinante - 14 May 2011 04:44 AM

Likewise how the 9/11 hijackers boozed it up with strippers right before . . . . . . .

Ahh, the cost of staying away from TV.

tell me more, tell me more, but you don’t have to brag. . .

 Signature 

We need each other, to keep ourselves honest

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 04:17 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 116 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  21
Joined  2009-11-03

Malcolm X’s beliefs changed when he discovered Elijah Muhammad was a hypocrite

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 09:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 117 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  491
Joined  2008-02-25
asanta - 14 May 2011 11:01 PM

Aside from the fundies, Americans don’t care, and the muslims believe it is a part of a smear campaign against their martyr, even if they know it is true..

It’s not a smear campaign if it’s true and relevant.  It would be miscommunication to withhold that information if this is the case.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 09:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 118 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1071
Joined  2007-06-20
asanta - 14 May 2011 11:01 PM

...muslims believe it is a part of a smear campaign against their martyr, even if they know it is true..

I don’t know if they know it is true.  For whatever reason(s), conspiracy theories are part and parcel of the Muslim world, even to the point of self-contradicting beliefs. 

Many Muslims love bin Laden for the black eye he gave to the U.S. on 911, while at the same time they believe it was really the Joooooooooos who were behind 9/11.  They literally want to have it both ways.  So when it comes to some porn, (even though many Muslims probably have their own secret and illegal stash), I would imagine that they will simply not believe that bin Laden had any.  And the usual suspects (the Joooooooooos), will be believed the ones who made up the lie or planted the porn.

Likewise bin Laden gets to be a martyr all while many Muslims simultaneously believe he really isn’t dead.  Once again, both ways!

 Signature 

There are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by the gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation.

—James Madison

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 01:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 119 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7684
Joined  2008-04-11
Rocinante - 15 May 2011 09:53 AM
asanta - 14 May 2011 11:01 PM

...muslims believe it is a part of a smear campaign against their martyr, even if they know it is true..

I don’t know if they know it is true.  For whatever reason(s), conspiracy theories are part and parcel of the Muslim world, even to the point of self-contradicting beliefs. 

Many Muslims love bin Laden for the black eye he gave to the U.S. on 911, while at the same time they believe it was really the Joooooooooos who were behind 9/11.  They literally want to have it both ways.  So when it comes to some porn, (even though many Muslims probably have their own secret and illegal stash), I would imagine that they will simply not believe that bin Laden had any.  And the usual suspects (the Joooooooooos), will be believed the ones who made up the lie or planted the porn.

Likewise bin Laden gets to be a martyr all while many Muslims simultaneously believe he really isn’t dead.  Once again, both ways!

I didn’t make myself clear. By ‘they’, I mean his generals, and those in the upper echelons of his organization whom he would most likely share his videos with.
I totally agree with your statement.

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 01:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 120 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1071
Joined  2007-06-20
asanta - 15 May 2011 01:07 PM

I didn’t make myself clear. By ‘they’, I mean his generals, and those in the upper echelons of his organization whom he would most likely share his videos with.

Ahhh, I see.  I wonder if any of his closest associates appear in any homemade porn he may have had?  I wonder if bin Laden appears in any of it!  The man knew how to get in front of a video camera!  LOL

 Signature 

There are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by the gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation.

—James Madison

Profile
 
 
   
8 of 10
8