traveler - 06 May 2011 09:52 AM
And do you believe he is dead even without pics???
Yes I do.
A conspiracy of massive proportions would be required to say he was dead when he wasn’t.
Obama would have to be in on it.
All of Obama’s closest advisers would have to be in on it.
Senators would have to be in on it.
The military would have to be in on it.
The elite unit who was credited with killing him would have to be in on it.
The intelligence agencies that provided the intelligence would have to be in on it.
The people who knew the dead bodies whose pictures we do have would have to be in on it.
Even al-Qaeda, who now confirms he was killed, would have to be in on it.
Hatching such a conspiracy and keeping it going would be more difficult than hunting down and killing bin laden.
Don’t get me wrong, I want to see the pictures. I disagree with the decision not to release them. Any conflicting reports ala timelines, how it went down, etc., are more easily explained due to the fog of war, simple misunderstandings in the relaying of details from those who were there to their superiors, to theirs, to theirs eventually working its way to the media. Combine that with the very real possibility that many details are probably being purposely withheld or even altered to protect intelligence sources and other people, including a possibility of someone who decided they wanted $25,000,000!