Since you took it as a personal victory that I “ran away”,.
Victories in Newtonian are for people trying to play ego games. That psychological BS is for kids.
This is about scientific kid’s stuff. Newtonian physics is 300 years old.
People that can’t figure out grade school physics 42 years after the Moon landing just deserve to be laughed at.
When you can build a self supporting model that can be completely collapsed by the fall of its top 15% or less then I may take you seriously. The fact that you even said most of the of the core was still standing was just laughable. I have seen that video plenty of times. Your CLAIM could only sound plausible to someone who had not seen it.
How can anyone know how much most of the core consisted of when we NEVER hear how many feet of horizontal steel were in the core? We are never shown a layout of how the horizontal beams were arranged in the core. The important information that is missing about those buildings merely demonstrates what a farce this entire business is.
And then Purdue joined the fray with their supposed SCIENTIFIC simulation of the north tower impact.
They show the horizontal beams in the core but then they have the core columns remaining stationary during the plane impact even though the NIST report provides empirical data indicating the south tower moved 15 inches due to the plane impact and then oscillated for four minutes.
So either Purdue or the NIST is being totally unscientific. . .