Eugenie Scott - Defending Climate Education
Posted: 16 January 2012 06:26 PM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  170
Joined  2009-06-02

Host:Chris Mooney

Eugenie Scott is no stranger to Point of Inquiry, or to the secular community. Her endless travails to defend the teaching of evolution have won her immense respect.

And that’s why, when Scott and her National Center for Science Education take on a new initiative, everybody listens. So for this Point of Inquiry episode, we invited Eugenie to break some news about why she is venturing into a very new and very challenging area—defending the teaching of accurate climate change science in schools from a mounting ideological assault—and how you can help her out.

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/eugenie_scott_defending_climate_education/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 January 2012 05:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4400
Joined  2010-08-15

Interesting interview.  Potentially helpful to educators.

Though I wish I could ask Chris personally: 
What about the whole general apathy that seems to be drowning the AGW issue? 

It’s implications are too overwhelming and the easiest thing for humans seems to be to ignore it all together ~ all we want to worry about is getting through today and tomorrow itself,
let next decade take care of itself. 

Specially when you have the well funded megaphone of the “echo-chamber of denial” telling everyone to forget about it: no worries.

Chris are you out there? . . .  some thoughts would be appreciated.

 Signature 

We need each other, to keep ourselves honest

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 January 2012 04:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2425
Joined  2007-07-05

Since AGW is related to economics how do scientists deal with getting the mathematics correct in economics.

Does it make sense to compute the depreciation of capital goods while ignoring the depreciation of durable consumer goods?

Both of them get added to GDP when they are purchased.

The reason for apathy is that it has turned into nothing but hot air about hot air.  I just get tired of hearing the talk even when I agree with it.

Where are AGW people talking about Planned Obsolescence?

psik

 Signature 

Fiziks is Fundamental

Profile