MEMORIES ARE BUILD IN THE BRAIN, IT YOU DONT HAVE THE SAME BRAIN- YOU WONT HAVE THE SAME MEMORIES :D
Even though I dont have this brain also I still have some memories.I can prove it.Even your two hemisphears remove also you have some memories left.Because of the conscient entity continuously there.Soul use the brain memory center to store memories.Soul thinks through the mechanisum of brain.But even that memory center replaced also it has some perminent memories in it.
Every one have two types of memories.Perminent memories and temporary memories.Temporary memories will wiped when your brain removed and tranplant some other’s brain.But perminent memories still alive even you remove your two hemisphears also and attach new hemisphear.You wont feel that you are a new person after that also.I will give some examples of these pecular type.Please Give me time.Now I have imporatant exams for my students.I am working on them.I will give you the incidents of them for sure.
this is the biggest nonsense I’ve ever heard :D
http://www.ebonmusings.org/atheism/ghost.html#part2 read and educate yourself
And using split-brain cases to as proof for the existence of soul is like using Holocaust to proof that Nazi Germany loved Jews :D :D Really read before telling such things
And again not onely from biological point of view, but:
Don’t worry about the details; it’s the fact that the equation exists that matters, not its particular form. It’s the Dirac equation — the two terms on the left are roughly the velocity of the electron and its inertia — coupled to electromagnetism and gravity, the two terms on the right.
If you believe in an immaterial soul that interacts with our bodies, you need to believe that this equation is not right, even at everyday energies. There needs to be a new term (at minimum) on the right, representing how the soul interacts with electrons. (If that term doesn’t exist, electrons will just go on their way as if there weren’t any soul at all, and then what’s the point?)
In physics, more specifically relativistic quantum mechanics, the Dirac equation is a wave equation, formulated by British physicist Paul Dirac in 1928. It provided a description of elementary spin-½ particles, such as electrons, consistent with both the principles of quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity, and was the first theory fully to account for relativity in the context of quantum mechanics
Thus in order to fit the concept of an “immaterial soul” into physics, you need to alter not only the “Dirac equation”, but also “quantum mechanics and “special relativity”? IOW do away with modern physics in order to “believe” in an immaterial soul. I am not opposed to the concept of “metaphysics”, but only if it fits with what we do know.
Therefore the argument for a metaphysical immaterial soul has not been made and we return to “belief without evidence”.
Again wrong.No one cant able to say at the age of 3 how children born and the intercourse process.From where shanti learn how that process happen in detail and convince kedarnath?She convince him in by saying which are not reveal to any one except lugdi her self known.
I knew, I had heard it on the tv when I was young and I was shoked, thats why I remember it. However you will now say: “she didnt have tv then” - yeah its not about tv its about infrormation, you can get such information from 3184737653 places. But eaven thats not the point, because noone ever said that she did that, who said it was that man I guess http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d5AtvjHMmg And yousing such guy as proof is just silly. How old is he 40? He was bon 30 years after her case? Just not reliable.
No where it was told that kedarnath visited delhi 100 times for 4 years.This is just imagination.In no report it was told that she met him 3-4 times.Again that could sound clearly shows that it is your self imagination.(Logical thinking in your words).But to accept Need proofs.Not self imaginations.Do you have any concrete proofs that shanti met him before 3-4 times in the shop in front of her house.No where that proof is there in any report.Dont be over think.You cant prove it.I told its just a critics self imagination.He just think like you as things may not happen like this.But others also fallow that self imagination.But you cant proove that it was just imagination.
So the answer for this also proved wrong.
I gave you information, about him visiting the shop, you are just ignoring it, because it blows apart your idea of the world. Open your mind and think man, think.
Did you get my question?
4.How she narrated number of incidents connected with her life?How she know what type of dresses lugdi wear?
Who siad that, the report doesn’t?! I know that you have white shirt, you have jeans, you have t-shirts. I know what every girl in bulgaria wears: blue/black jeans, white/black sneakers, dress. It is normal to know that, does not proof anything. If one wants to find evidance he can find it in every word, she might guessed just one word, but the family who want their children to be reborn and alive will find it as ultimate truth, then with the years it will be exaggerated, till the point where some strange man use it as “biggest proof ever”
.Why the little girl shanti burust into tears?Did a small girl at her age know that much emotional feelings?
What is my question and what you answered?I asked you shanti’s emotional reaction on meeting her previous relatives at her little age.
Again no answer for this question.
Kids are able to feel empathy just as any adult, eaven much more empathy then an adult. When I was little boy I could of cry for a friend who is sick, or for someone in a movie, or for the poor kids in africa. But now I’m not such easy to be moved by such events, you know why? In puberty the testosterone plays role in making the child adult. Having much Testosterone will make you less able to fell empathy [if you dont know what empathy is- read about it, because I think you dont uderstand what it means].
Dont see a reason to answer?Afride before truth?You need not to make me feel better.I know how kids behave at the age of four years.Shanti was completely different at her child age also.Not like other two more kids in her home.
Because I answered it before: SHE WAS TAKEN To A PSYCHOLOGIST, AND IT WAS PROOVEN THAT SHE HAS THE EGO OF A CHILD. [AGAIN READ ABOUT THE EGO, ‘CAUSE IT SEEMS YOU DONT KNOW WHAT THAT IS]
So it is proven that your answers are wrong not any of my question weak.
NO, IT SEEMS NOT :d READ FRIEND, READ AND LEARN : ]