domokato - 11 April 2012 02:13 PM
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez - 11 April 2012 11:41 AM
domokato - 11 April 2012 10:51 AM
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez - 11 April 2012 02:19 AM
domokato - 10 April 2012 10:36 AM
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez - 09 April 2012 05:31 PM
domokato - 09 April 2012 03:12 PM
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez - 09 April 2012 12:11 PM
domokato - 09 April 2012 10:55 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afterimage
With my experiment, we noticed that as we approach the dimensional window, this reduces their size. And when you retire from the dimensional window, it grows in size.
The same is true with your eyes closed (proven).
What we see, is not an image but a dimensional window.
You’re saying that when you turn out the lights, light comes out of my eyes and that’s what I’m seeing? Why don’t other people see it? They see their own afterimages, not mine.
You can only see your own energy by opening a hole in the distance. And your brain is connected to the dimensional window, not another person, it is individual.
Evidence?
What you want, a door to another dimension? When her invent publish it.
How about some data, experiments, repeatable observations, anything like that? Or is this stuff just off the top of your head?
I am going to repeat the experiment…
The experiment described in your infographic does not narrow down which theory of afterimages is correct.
Concepts wanted in the dictionary:
Fascinate: Dazzle much approaching the eyes the lamp or candle, or presenting coup before an excessive amount of light.
Remaining image: Figure, representation, likeness and appearance of something.
The image created by the energy of the light, if it is a image of remnant.
But on this occasion the energy of light opens a dimensional door.
I did the experiment:
1 I noticed a bulb lit for 15 seconds.
2 I turned off the light
3. With eyes closed I went to a wall and the image, reduced its size.
4.-Conclusion: this is not a remnant image.