3 of 3
3
Religion Is Abomination
Posted: 17 May 2012 06:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 31 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2671
Joined  2011-04-24
CuthbertJ - 16 May 2012 10:46 AM

Aristopus - I get the underlying sentiment you’re trying to express.  The way I express it, when I express it, is “religion is the root of most evil”.  Much of western culture is rooted in Christianity, so much so that most people don’t even realize it, and the damage it’s done.  And you’ll always run up against folks like George who will use the old “it’s not religion that’s bad, it’s the people who use it for bad purposes.”  Folks like that, and almost all religious folks will never respond to reasoning and writing, etc.  It’s an emotional, psychological dependence they have.  I realized this way back in college.  I had a roommate who was the valedictorian, was being sought out for his work in economics even as an undergrad, etc.  And yet when we talked about religion you couldn’t tell him apart from the sorriest dumbass redneck you ever met.  He clung to his religion for emotional reasons, not logical ones.  And that was that.

So personally I gave up trying to convert or convince “believers” long ago.  IMHO you just have to be a good example yourself, and really rise above religion in a way, to realize if it’s what it takes for some to get by, then help them along in that regard.  The hard part too is to realize religion IS wrong in the sense that astrology is, it’s just that because there’s such an emotional aspect to it, and the world is still so barbaric, it’s just going to take many generations and technological advances before it goes the way of astrology.

You shouldn’t hold your breath, astrology is still believed in by many people - even well educated people.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 May 2012 05:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 32 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  118
Joined  2011-02-05

Hey all. Been a while since I posted, but figured I’d chime in.

A couple of warning signs I observed from the thread title and the OP’s posts.

Seeing “Religion is Abomination” struck me as odd because it is simply a reversal of a common western Christian trope. As thinking, critical, skeptical people, I think it is our duty to not only criticize silly ideas, but to be wary of mirroring the methods by which they were created and are continually defended. However, I also appreciate irony, so I clicked the link. I went on to read what essentially constitutes a rant (by the author’s own admission) rather than a cogent argument. It sounds suspiciously like the rants often espoused in religious groups re: the secular world…lacking nuance, understanding, sensitivity, or very much connection with the reality of its subject matter. Painting religion with a wide brush is succumbing to the same harmful heuristic that makes many of the folks in groups like CFI so frustrated with religion in the first place. Not that I don’t appreciate a good rant, but I usually enjoy ones that are funny and involve specific stories of ridiculousness, rather than overt generalization. That’s just…boring.

I also have to call out the claims of threat receipt. Not that there aren’t some crazy folks on the internet, but over the past 10 years I’ve participated in a lot of pretty heated internet discussions in a variety of different forums, and never received any type of threat. I’ve gotten banned from a few Christian websites (which I’ve always counted victory), but never threatened. As a matter of fact, more often than not I’ve gotten very well-intentioned, if misguided, attempts to connect and (ostensibly) be evangelized. Maybe this is just me being naive or ignorant, but I doubt the veracity of the OP’s claims. Even if they are true, they don’t add any clout to the post.

George, I appreciate the succinctness of your replies, and you and Occam for maintaining critical standards, regardless of the conclusions of the poster. It’s easy to affirm someone just because we agree or sympathize with what they’re saying, but that obviously violates some of the most fundamental tenets of scientific thinking.

 Signature 

“Ah! How cheerfully we consign ourselves to Perdition!”
-Melville-

“If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers.”
-Pynchon-

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 May 2012 05:14 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 33 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1191
Joined  2011-08-01
The_Au_Mean - 22 May 2012 05:56 PM

Hey all. Been a while since I posted, but figured I’d chime in.

You need to post more often!

 Signature 

Free in Kentucky
—Humanist
“I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it.”—Edith Sitwell

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 May 2012 01:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 34 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  776
Joined  2009-07-17
George - 17 May 2012 10:47 AM

Again, there is a strong correlation between lower fertility and education, but it’s far from being clear what exactly is causing what here. The funny thing is, though, that those with the very high socio-economic status often have more children than everybody else. But the very rich are an abnormality, so it makes a little difference.


15SIEGEL-blog480.jpg

I finally figured out why Romney looks ‘familiar’ to me! He reminds me a of a young Fred Gwynne (Herman Munster).

Take care,

Derek

 Signature 

“It is noble to be good; it is still nobler to teach others to be good—and less trouble.”—Mark Twain

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 May 2012 03:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 35 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3052
Joined  2011-11-04

Looks can be deceiving.  Herman Munster could relate better to the common man.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 04:17 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 36 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1191
Joined  2011-08-01
TimB - 23 May 2012 03:04 PM

Looks can be deceiving.  Herman Munster could relate better to the common man.

Are you saying that Romney can’t relate to the common man? That’s not true. Some of his best friends are friends of people who know some common folks.

 Signature 

Free in Kentucky
—Humanist
“I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it.”—Edith Sitwell

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 05:07 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 37 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  9301
Joined  2006-08-29

The one thing I find very unattractive about Romney is the way he walks. Why doesn’t anybody tell him his steps are too short and that he needs to slow down?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 12:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 38 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7665
Joined  2008-04-11
FreeInKy - 24 May 2012 04:17 AM
TimB - 23 May 2012 03:04 PM

Looks can be deceiving.  Herman Munster could relate better to the common man.

Are you saying that Romney can’t relate to the common man? That’s not true. Some of his best friends are friends of people who know some common folks.

......the ones they laid off?

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 05:51 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 39 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1191
Joined  2011-08-01
asanta - 25 May 2012 12:26 AM
FreeInKy - 24 May 2012 04:17 AM
TimB - 23 May 2012 03:04 PM

Looks can be deceiving.  Herman Munster could relate better to the common man.

Are you saying that Romney can’t relate to the common man? That’s not true. Some of his best friends are friends of people who know some common folks.

......the ones they laid off?

LOL

 Signature 

Free in Kentucky
—Humanist
“I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it.”—Edith Sitwell

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 12:02 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 40 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3052
Joined  2011-11-04
George - 24 May 2012 05:07 AM

The one thing I find very unattractive about Romney is the way he walks. Why doesn’t anybody tell him his steps are too short and that he needs to slow down?


I don’t recall ever watching him walk, but I’ll take your word for it.  Perhaps, if he is not elected President, he should be appointed to the Ministry of Funny Walks.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 12:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 41 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3132
Joined  2011-08-15

Maybe his magic underwear is in a bunch. LOL


Cap’t Jack

 Signature 

One good schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.

Thomas Paine

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 12:26 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 42 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3052
Joined  2011-11-04

What does magical underwear do that is magical?

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 01:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 43 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3052
Joined  2011-11-04
TimB - 25 May 2012 12:26 PM

What does magical underwear do that is magical?

I looked it up:  “...First, the garment provides the member “a constant reminder” of the covenants they made in the temple. Second, the garment “when properly worn…provides protection against temptation and evil”. Wearing the garment is also “an outward expression of an inward commitment” to follow Jesus Christ.[7] General authority Carlos E. Asay adds that the garment “strengthens the wearer to resist temptation, fend off evil influences, and stand firmly for the right.”[8]

...virtually all wearers expressed a belief that wearing the garment provided “spiritual protection” and encouraged them to keep their covenants.[9] Some ... “asserted that the garment also provided physical protection, while others seemed less certain of any physical aspect to protection.”[9] In Mormon folklore, tales are told of Latter-day Saints who credit their temple garments with helping them survive car wrecks, fires, and natural disasters.[1]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garment

Also, I learned that the term “magical underwear” is generally considered offensive by Mormons.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 01:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 44 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6021
Joined  2009-02-26
TimB - 25 May 2012 12:26 PM

What does magical underwear do that is magical?

A pair of queen Elizabeth’s panties just sold for $40,000. Must be something magical about them.

 Signature 

Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind.
W4U

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 May 2012 12:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 45 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3052
Joined  2011-11-04
Write4U - 25 May 2012 01:39 PM
TimB - 25 May 2012 12:26 PM

What does magical underwear do that is magical?

A pair of queen Elizabeth’s panties just sold for $40,000. Must be something magical about them.

Hopefully the money went to a good cause.  Otherwise what is outside the realm of rationale explanation (aka, magical) is that there exists someone with so much money that they would spend $40,000 on a pair of the Queen Mum’s knickers.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
   
3 of 3
3