rev. Charles worley has a plan to rid Merica of gays and lesbians. Fence them off and starve them to death. He also wants the congregation to vote against that “baby killer and homo” in the White House.
He’s going to get really far with that argument. Maybe I’m just living in a bubble, but I have a hard time imagining even the few of my peers who sympathize with the “homosexuality is wrong” concept finding a way to agree with that guy. But who knows…people love enthusiasm.
Nothing like a close minded hypocrite to generate unwarranted enthusiasm. He’s definitely not a credit to his profession and personally I hope the IRS yanks his tax exempt status or his congregation pitches him out on his racist butt.
Apparently homosexuality is so dangerous and contagious that you can;t deliver food by truck, you have to airdrop it in to the population of gay and lesbian people behind the fence. What a nut?
He also wants the congregation to vote against that “baby killer and homo” in the White House.
Wonderful sentiment there, eh wot?
I’m sure there are a lot of good reasons to vote for somebody other then either Obama, Romney, or anybody else who wants the office, but that sort of demonization isn’t one of them.
Apparently homosexuality is so dangerous and contagious that you can;t deliver food by truck, you have to airdrop it in to the population of gay and lesbian people behind the fence. What a nut?
Sounds like someone in deep denial about something ...
Sounds like someone in deep denial about something ...
My thoughts exactly. As my wife and I watched his video rant, and BTW he spewed his poison from the pulpit in the 70’s, I said, “there is a latent homosexual”. That man is in solid denial!
The Reverand’s premise brings to mind a question. Is homosexuality expressed due to a certain gene/s that some persons have and some don’t? If so, then perhaps cordoning off all gays, could result in the rest of the population propogating only heterosexuals. I think it is probably more complex than that, however. Maybe we all have genes that could potentially express homosexuality, but for some biochemical (or other) reasons they are expressed in some of us but not in others.
The Reverand’s premise brings to mind a question. Is homosexuality expressed due to a certain gene/s that some persons have and some don’t? If so, then perhaps cordoning off all gays, could result in the rest of the population propogating only heterosexuals. I think it is probably more complex than that, however. Maybe we all have genes that could potentially express homosexuality, but for some biochemical (or other) reasons they are expressed in some of us but not in others.
No, that wouldn’t work, gays are for the most part the product of straight parents and unless there is a surrogate involved, they cannot reproduce (as the good Reverend so cheerfully points out), however, if you cordon off the parents, siblings and cousins of gays…because obviously they carry this awful gene…then you may have a chance at getting rid of teh gay….somehow, I don’t think he would go along with that… most of his congregation would be behind that fence. At least the ones having family members brave enough to come out of the closet!
(..and no, I don’t believe there is ‘a’ gay gene, I’m sure, like many other things..it’s much more complicated.)
I think that homosexuality may be an adaptive process for the human race. The contingencies that may have made it unacceptable earlier in our history, including the need to be fruitful and multiply as a species, no longer exists to the degree that it once did.
most of his congregation would be behind that fence. At least the ones having family members brave enough to come out of the closet!
