1 of 7
1
Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
Posted: 24 May 2012 03:28 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  604
Joined  2011-08-10

Should man rule over women for women’s own good?


Scriptures, and other myth’s, say that God determined that men should rule over women. This gives form,—- in a demographic sense,——to our common and society, and says that our demographic pyramid should have a hierarchical shape and or form. This initiates tension and has God demonizing woman, as well as any notion of female equality with man.

His motive must be for the good of women. Somehow!
After all, sanctity of the family is one of the main points of morality.

God was arguably right for his time. Think in the barbaric way. Below the belt. Thank God that time is almost past. Women in our modern world do not need man’s dubious ape like help. I hope you agree. Be honest now with yourself be you male or female.

Men have dominated women long enough I think. To give them equality would be justice.

What do you think?
What would real men do?
What would real women demand?
Do men and women have what it takes to be free?

Justice under law should be gender and age neutral, with limits, but with a good spirit of assuring equality. We do not administer that justice.  We only give it lip service. Men are not walking their talk. Neither are women.

In Gods timocracy, a place of government in which love of honor is the ruling principle. All honors go to the Queen and her children. A king’s first responsibility is to insure the veneration of his queen. Honor demands it. He accepts this burden and pleasure wisely. The Queen, as the Beta archetype is the life of the kingdom. The archetypal king’s duty is to raise woman’s position. That means that all men have the same duty. That of not denying women equality and elevating her.

Men. Be good kings. You are making good just men look bad. Step up.
God wills it.

Women. Be good queens and demand what is yours.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez6wfJWVCeI&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iMBUoxLOmA


Regards
DL

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 03:55 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2012-02-15

What do you think?
What would real men do?
What would real women demand?
Do men and women have what it takes to be free?

If we begin asking questions like, “What should a man do about the current state of affairs?” or “What should a woman do about this?”, our questions fail to address the very equality that we are suggesting exists among men and women. If this sense of equality is not so erroneous, then the answers we hold to be true will be true to men and women alike. I think that there is no clear inferior gender, and the differences we perceive are rather negligible when it comes to ethics. A person devoted to this principle of equality would perhaps benefit from restating the questions as to not be so selective with the answers they seek by asking, “What should a human being do? What should we do?”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 04:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5976
Joined  2009-02-26

Actually, the first biblical woman, Lilith, was equal to the first biblical man, Adam.
But when she disobeyed him, Adam must have been the first man to utter the words, “you bitch!”
Apparently god agreed with Adam and is why he made the second biblical woman from Adam’s rib, so that Woman was made of Man. But when Eve caused the fall from innocence of Adam, god was convinced that he had made a serious mistake and gave man the power make woman forever subservient to man, on fear of death.

[ Edited: 24 May 2012 04:10 PM by Write4U ]
 Signature 

Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind.
W4U

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 04:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  232
Joined  2011-09-13
Greatest I am - 24 May 2012 03:28 PM

Should man rule over women for women’s own good?


Scriptures, and other myth’s, say that God determined that men should rule over women. This gives form,—- in a demographic sense,——to our common and society, and says that our demographic pyramid should have a hierarchical shape and or form. This initiates tension and has God demonizing woman, as well as any notion of female equality with man.

His motive must be for the good of women. Somehow!
After all, sanctity of the family is one of the main points of morality.

God was arguably right for his time. Think in the barbaric way. Below the belt. Thank God that time is almost past. Women in our modern world do not need man’s dubious ape like help. I hope you agree. Be honest now with yourself be you male or female.

Men have dominated women long enough I think. To give them equality would be justice.

What do you think?
What would real men do?
What would real women demand?
Do men and women have what it takes to be free?

Justice under law should be gender and age neutral, with limits, but with a good spirit of assuring equality. We do not administer that justice.  We only give it lip service. Men are not walking their talk. Neither are women.

In Gods timocracy, a place of government in which love of honor is the ruling principle. All honors go to the Queen and her children. A king’s first responsibility is to insure the veneration of his queen. Honor demands it. He accepts this burden and pleasure wisely. The Queen, as the Beta archetype is the life of the kingdom. The archetypal king’s duty is to raise woman’s position. That means that all men have the same duty. That of not denying women equality and elevating her.

Men. Be good kings. You are making good just men look bad. Step up.
God wills it.

Women. Be good queens and demand what is yours.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez6wfJWVCeI&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iMBUoxLOmA


Regards
DL

In all of history, and probably before, men have made a mell of a hess about everything so the answer to the question is obvious.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 04:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5184
Joined  2010-06-16

Testosterone seems to be the root of much of human agression and greed so maybe we should either turn the job of leading over to women or require that any male who wishes to move into a leadership role be castrated at least five years before taking that job.  LOL

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 04:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  5
Joined  2011-10-19
Occam. - 24 May 2012 04:30 PM

Testosterone seems to be the root of much of human agression and greed so maybe we should either turn the job of leading over to women or require that any male who wishes to move into a leadership role be castrated at least five years before taking that job.  LOL

Occam

Quite right…it is a known fact that no woman EVER did anything negative while all hopped up on hormones.

 Signature 

Shepherds don’t shepherd because they love sheep.
They shepherd because they love wool and mutton.
-James Randi

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 May 2012 06:47 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5184
Joined  2010-06-16

Maybe not EVER, but the ratio of male led or caused atrocities to female ones is pretty strongly tilted in the direction of males.

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 12:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7641
Joined  2008-04-11

It is difficult to believe that the USA still cannot get the ERA ratified in the 21st century.

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 09:06 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Jr. Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  34
Joined  2008-09-29

The two concepts “a good spirit of assuring equality” and “All honors go to the Queen and her children” are directly opposed to one another.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 12:24 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2788
Joined  2011-11-04
Occam. - 24 May 2012 04:30 PM

Testosterone seems to be the root of much of human agression and greed so maybe we should either turn the job of leading over to women or require that any male who wishes to move into a leadership role be castrated at least five years before taking that job.  LOL

Occam

I know you’re kidding, but I don’t think testosterone is the problem.  I mean a lot of our chicken hawk leaders (those who promote military action routinely and often) are and have been old men who surely had decreased testosterone by virtue of age.

 Signature 

“Our lives are not our own. From womb to tomb… We are bound to others, past and present… And by each crime and every kindness… We birth our future.”  Sonmi, 2144.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 01:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  90
Joined  2012-04-24
Write4U - 24 May 2012 04:03 PM

Actually, the first biblical woman, Lilith, was equal to the first biblical man, Adam.

Lilith wasn’t in the Bible. She wasn’t invented until probably the 3rd-5th Century CE.

 Signature 

Dum ratio nos ducet, valebimus et multa bene geremus.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 01:45 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5976
Joined  2009-02-26
Austin Harper - 25 May 2012 01:30 PM
Write4U - 24 May 2012 04:03 PM

Actually, the first biblical woman, Lilith, was equal to the first biblical man, Adam.

Lilith wasn’t in the Bible. She wasn’t invented until probably the 3rd-5th Century CE.

She was in the earliest scriptures known.

http://www.gnosis.org/lilith.htm

God then formed Lilith, the first woman, just as He had formed Adam, except that He used filth and sediment instead of pure dust. From Adam’s union with this demoness, and with another like her named Naamah, Tubal Cain’s sister, sprang Asmodeus and innumerable demons that still plague mankind. Many generations later, Lilith and Naamah came to Solomon’s judgement seat, disguised as harlots of Jerusalem’. [4]

(d) Adam and Lilith never found peace together; for when he wished to lie with her, she took offence at the recumbent posture he demanded. ‘Why must I lie beneath you?’ she asked. ‘I also was made from dust, and am therefore your equal.’ Because Adam tried to compel her obedience by force, Lilith, in a rage, uttered the magic name of God, rose into the air and left him.

[ Edited: 25 May 2012 01:48 PM by Write4U ]
 Signature 

Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind.
W4U

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 May 2012 02:17 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2588
Joined  2011-04-24
Greatest I am - 24 May 2012 03:28 PM

Should man rule over women for women’s own good?


Scriptures, and other myth’s, say that God determined that men should rule over women. This gives form,—- in a demographic sense,——to our common and society, and says that our demographic pyramid should have a hierarchical shape and or form. This initiates tension and has God demonizing woman, as well as any notion of female equality with man.

His motive must be for the good of women. Somehow!
After all, sanctity of the family is one of the main points of morality.

God was arguably right for his time. Think in the barbaric way. Below the belt. Thank God that time is almost past. Women in our modern world do not need man’s dubious ape like help. I hope you agree. Be honest now with yourself be you male or female.

Men have dominated women long enough I think. To give them equality would be justice.

What do you think?
What would real men do?
What would real women demand?
Do men and women have what it takes to be free?

Justice under law should be gender and age neutral, with limits, but with a good spirit of assuring equality. We do not administer that justice.  We only give it lip service. Men are not walking their talk. Neither are women.

In Gods timocracy, a place of government in which love of honor is the ruling principle. All honors go to the Queen and her children. A king’s first responsibility is to insure the veneration of his queen. Honor demands it. He accepts this burden and pleasure wisely. The Queen, as the Beta archetype is the life of the kingdom. The archetypal king’s duty is to raise woman’s position. That means that all men have the same duty. That of not denying women equality and elevating her.

Men. Be good kings. You are making good just men look bad. Step up.
God wills it.

Women. Be good queens and demand what is yours.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez6wfJWVCeI&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iMBUoxLOmA


Regards
DL

Heavy on the idealism.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 May 2012 08:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  604
Joined  2011-08-10
Tallusbryne - 24 May 2012 03:55 PM

What do you think?
What would real men do?
What would real women demand?
Do men and women have what it takes to be free?

If we begin asking questions like, “What should a man do about the current state of affairs?” or “What should a woman do about this?”, our questions fail to address the very equality that we are suggesting exists among men and women. If this sense of equality is not so erroneous, then the answers we hold to be true will be true to men and women alike. I think that there is no clear inferior gender, and the differences we perceive are rather negligible when it comes to ethics. A person devoted to this principle of equality would perhaps benefit from restating the questions as to not be so selective with the answers they seek by asking, “What should a human being do? What should we do?”

Asking men and women is asking human beings.

As to ethics, note that 95% of those in jail are men.

Who then appears to have better morals? Men or women, or which gender within humanity if you prefer.

Regards
DL

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 May 2012 08:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  604
Joined  2011-08-10
Write4U - 24 May 2012 04:03 PM

Actually, the first biblical woman, Lilith, was equal to the first biblical man, Adam.
But when she disobeyed him, Adam must have been the first man to utter the words, “you bitch!”
Apparently god agreed with Adam and is why he made the second biblical woman from Adam’s rib, so that Woman was made of Man. But when Eve caused the fall from innocence of Adam, god was convinced that he had made a serious mistake and gave man the power make woman forever subservient to man, on fear of death.

Poor Adam. Never to know the pleasures of being on the bottom.

Strange that Christianity does not recognize Lilith. They usurped the Jewish God but forgot to follow Jewish tradition in interpreting their myths.

Regards
DL

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 May 2012 08:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  604
Joined  2011-08-10
deros - 24 May 2012 04:03 PM

[

In all of history, and probably before, men have made a mell of a hess about everything so the answer to the question is obvious.

But, but, but, women made us do it!.

Just kidding.

Regards
DL

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 7
1