DarronS - 20 June 2012 07:15 AM

etcorngods - 20 June 2012 06:59 AM

I mean what I said, they couldn’t test landing on the Moon.  I don’t need to read those books.  I was there—was a scientist for NASA—Spacecraft Project Manager for SERT II.  Probably before you were born.

When was that? I was born in 1955.

Sorry, you were 6 yrs old.

Equal Opportunity Curmudgeon - 20 June 2012 07:30 AM

Space Electric Rocket Test at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SERT-1 which had nothing to do with the moon missions.

You found the link to SERT I, I was Spacecraft Project manager of SERT II.  Sert I (I was Spacecraft Coordinator of that project) was a ballistic shot.  SERT II was an orbital test.

I didn’t say the project was directly involved in the Moon project, but i worked on the Moon project as a representative of NASA to the public.

ET, if you were working at NASA in the 60’s, then you should have solid proof of the moon shot conspiracy. More than an alleged photo that you can’t find. Why not share some of your hard evidence?

FreeInKy - 20 June 2012 09:28 AM

ET, if you were working at NASA in the 60’s, then you should have solid proof of the moon shot conspiracy. More than an alleged photo that you can’t find. Why not share some of your hard evidence?

Solid proof, you think thousands of people working for NASA had “solid proof”?  Crazy.

macgyver - 19 June 2012 06:51 PM

This is the most entertaining thread I’ve seen in a while. I couldn’t stop laughing. I think you guys have all been taken for a ride here. There is no way this guy really believes this stuff. I mean even the name “ET Corn Gods”?? What a hoot. He’s just yanking your chain. He needs to check the calendar though. Its way past April 1st.

I dunno man. He put way too much work into this stuff to just be trolling. Unless he’s not actually the guy who runs the site…

etcorngods - 20 June 2012 09:39 AM

FreeInKy - 20 June 2012 09:28 AM

ET, if you were working at NASA in the 60’s, then you should have solid proof of the moon shot conspiracy. More than an alleged photo that you can’t find. Why not share some of your hard evidence?

Solid proof, you think thousands of people working for NASA had “solid proof”?  Crazy.

So how did they manage to conceal the truth from all those thousands of people?

FreeInKy - 20 June 2012 09:55 AM

etcorngods - 20 June 2012 09:39 AM

FreeInKy - 20 June 2012 09:28 AM

ET, if you were working at NASA in the 60’s, then you should have solid proof of the moon shot conspiracy. More than an alleged photo that you can’t find. Why not share some of your hard evidence?

Solid proof, you think thousands of people working for NASA had “solid proof”?  Crazy.

So how did they manage to conceal the truth from all those thousands of people?

I don’t know.  Probably less than 25 people had to know about it.

On the Internet ...

You should check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings.

NOTE: This is not me using Wikipedia as a source for facts that we landed on a moon.  This is a list of evidence that I urge you to check out on your own.  If you want, you can even run your own test with the retroreflectors!

dougsmith - 20 June 2012 10:23 AM

On the Internet ...

Quoting ETCG:

Probably less than 25 people had to know about it.

  Geez, learn to speak correct English.  It’s “fewer”, not “less”.

Occam

Occam. - 20 June 2012 11:32 AM

Quoting ETCG:

Probably less than 25 people had to know about it.

  Geez, learn to speak correct English.  It’s “fewer”, not “less”.

The ET Corn Gods probably sent him a special memo letting him know that “less” is now correct.

Sorry, duplicate post.

George - 20 June 2012 04:41 AM

etcorngods - 20 June 2012 03:07 AM

There are pictures from within the space vehicle on the way to the moon of someone’s hand outside of the window.

Really? Never heard of this one. Do you have a link to that photo?

This may be a case of a tale getting taller with each re-telling.  I’m not familiar with a “hand outside the window” claim but it’s a possibility he may be referring to a similar but less spectacular albeit still nutty claim made by Bart Sibrel.  Sibrel is the lunatic (pun intended) who called Buzz Aldrin—the second man to walk on the Moon—a “coward”, a “liar”, and a “thief”.  Aldrin then punched him, a one-time right I say Aldrin earned by being one of the men to walk on the Moon. 

Anyway, Sibrel claims an astronaut’s arm—not a hand, blocks a portion of the Earth at some point in a video while aiming the camera out the window.  I believe even the lunatic Sibrel admits the arm is from and astronaut and inside the capsule at the time.  But he somehow claims this proves the image of the Earth is a cutout hanging outside the capsule and/or that the capsule was only in low Earth orbit at the time.  Yeah, I don’t get it either, but then again, I’m sane. 

Prepare to be shocked by Sibrel’s “proof”.  Here is the “arm” blocking the Earth, from his video A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon!...

It’s either an astronaut’s arm or the window edge.  Either way it doesn’t change the fact that the Apollo Lunar Landings actually happened. 

Too bad Aldrin didn’t punch Sibrel harder, it might have knocked some sense into him.

Unbelievable. Thanks, Rocinante.