It’s not me that hasn’t read them. I dare you to present a single piece of scientific evidence from these gish gallop links that you believe supports the crackpot official explanation of how WTC 7 came down. You won’t do it because you know that no such evidence exists. If the evidence existed you’d explain it here simply instead of gish galloping away.
The 9/11 decade is the pinnacle of Western culture.
I don’t know why you pick on WTC7. I don’t even find it intellectually interesting. The building was 300 feet wide. But except for the obvious slight crimp, the roof line gives way simultaneously and falls uniformly across the entire 300 feet. How anyone can believe that fire or debris from a nearby fallen building could have caused that is beyond my comprehension.
The only shocking explanation which I find incomprehensible is that people find the alternative to the absurd belief in fire induced collapse, far more repugnant, so they can accept what defies physics.
At least WTC1 and WTC2 are intellectually interesting and do not look like normal controlled demolitions.
Suppose we had the north tower intact and then removed 5 stories, 91 through 95. That would leave a 60 foot gap with 15 stories in the air without support. They would fall. They would take 1.9 seconds to hit the top of the lower intact 90 stories and be traveling at 42 mph or 62 ft/sec.
Those 90 stories would be about 1080 feet tall. If the falling 15 stories could maintain a constant velocity while crushing six times as many stories as themselves even though they had to be stronger and heavier than the falling 15 stories then it would take 17.4 seconds to destroy 90 stories. This would yield a total of 19.3 seconds to destroy the north tower.
But Dr. Sunder of the NIST told NPR in a podcast the the north tower collapsed in 11 seconds.
Now why are we supposed to believe that was possible when the physics profession has not demanded and provided accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the north tower?
9/11 is the biggest farce of physics in human history.
But then we have atheists who portray themselves as intelligent, rational and scientific. So why do they have a problem with 300 year old Newtonian Physics 43 years after the Moon landing? And then the Empire State Building is 81 years old and designed without electronic computers because they didn’t exist in the 1920s. So no one can claim that skyscrapers are rocket science. But then they want to talk about climate change like that is not particularly complicated.
When I am in the right mood it is hysterically funny.
But to change their minds some people would have to admit they have been really dumb for ten years. At least I can say we still don’t have accurate data on the buildings. Like how much did all of the steel trusses and corrugated pans in a floor assembly weigh? I have never seen it. The physics profession has not been demanding it. Who knows?
Happy Independence Day! We are independent of physics.