This is why it is quite obvious psikey cannot seriously be holding his position. It’s bullshit and he knows it, otherwise he’d be talking to the experts to show them how they’re wrong instead of a bunch of online laypersons.
Frank Greening is a name who is supposedly an expert. He wrote papers involving the physics of this incident. BUT HE’S A CHEMIST!
I used Ryan Mackey to explain the concept of physical models in my video. He never built one by the way. Curious that! But I have seen no response from him regarding my model even though I used him for introduction.
But 9/11 has become a weird problem because of what the lay persons have already decided what they prefer to believe. Even most of the conspiracy theorists are more concerned about who did it than they are about the physics.
The physics profession has created a problem for itself because this is grade school physics. If the grade school physics cannot be explained with ACCURATE DATA on the buildings then the Official Story CANNOT BE TRUE. That would mean that the people in the nation that put men on the Moon are a bunch of dummies.
What would have happened if in the summer of 2002 a few thousand physicists had held a conference in New York explaining why airliners could not have done it? That is what makes 2012 so IRONIC. They find evidence of the Higgs Boson and land a 2000 pound robot on Mars but they have not explained in reasonable detail how a couple of airliners could totally destroy a couple of nearly identical skyscrapers in 1 and 2 hours. But people wanting to believe this have to blame it on the tube-in-tube design but when do they ever specify the total number of connections those floors had to the core and perimeter? If it really happened that way then why don’t we hear such simple information all of the time? Like if there is a God then why doesn’t He show up?
But what is the problem now? Now the physicists would have to explain why they didn’t expose the nonsense 10 years ago.
But that does not stop it from being grade school physics. So why can’t they even talk about the total quantity of concrete in the towers, much less the distributions of steel and concrete down the towers? Would that help show how absurd the collapse idea is?
If anything the question is why do lay people believe this is a complicated problem? Why can’t the physicists just build a physical model that can collapse if that is what happened?
We have this problem with Belief in EXPERT AUTHORITY. The egos of experts are on the line now.
And that includes all of the engineering schools.