Well, if you spend years digging for something you have a hunch about and don’t find anything, and are constantly told by others that there’s nothing there…some people just keep digging.
Well if you spend months digging for something and find something, some people are too pig-headed to even look at it. Take the OP for example. Anyone with an elementary school education in science should be able to read it and see the monumental flaws in the crackpot official 9/11 theory yet all we get is diversion and limp-wristed bare assertion logical fallacies from posters here. How is it that CFI apparently has no one with any rudimentary understanding of science or capacity for critical thought posting in this science forum to defend CFI from allegations of scientific fraud?
Doesn’t a scientific fraud have to involve some specific area of science to be tested against like biology or chemistry or something? What area of science are you saying this fraud is occurring in? What body of knowledge do we use to test to see if there is a fraud?
Ever hear of something called the scientific method? What area of science does that occur in?