My previous post seems to have not come out the way I intended and got lost in the middle of the post I was responding to. Eeven though I deliberately wrote my comments at the very end of the quoted material, somehow they wound up in the middle of it.
Here’s what I wrote:
Neither you nor anyone else has shown evidence of some other scenario regarding the WTC. All you do is criticize the computer models and generally accepted explanations. You offer no rational alternative explanation. Those who try to offer absolutely no evidence for their speculations. There may be some flaws in the computer models or accepted explanations but they have scientific probability on their side. Deniers have not a scintilla of evidence on theirs. You find flaws in the computer models buy fail to realize that your own scenarios are not just flawed but irrational on their face. You don’t even have a rational explanation as to what you think actually happened if the computer models are wrong. All anyone has to offer are unlikely or downright impossible scenarios. You’d be better off writing science fiction and calling it that upfront. Maybe you could actually get it published and have it read.
I read it. And at the time I got the impression you were addressing Michael Fullerton. At the time I had not said much about computer models. Am I to assume you are now addressing me?
Fullerton did not discuss modeling in any detail. He seems to have an averaion to physics. Has he been banned?