Now that we are off page six, here is some arrogance for you. Your writing skills are abysmal. The word you wanted was “cite” not “sight.” You often use incomplete sentences, and much of what you write makes no sense. Poor writing often indicates poor thinking, and you have consistently demonstrated poor thinking skills, starting with your original post.
My understanding is different from his but he’s too arrogant to take that into consideration
Stating facts is not arrogance. You do not understand atheism at all. You are making the classic mistake of not being able to see the world from someone else’s viewpoint. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in any god.
Is Atheism doomed to extinction?
Though it may be a fact that it is the fastest growing religion (referred to in the media - I would call it a belief system)...
Atheism is neither religion nor a belief system.
1) Why advocate the theory of evolution, but not promote the completely logical notion of higher evolved beings?
You are assuming evolution will always lead to constantly higher intelligence. If you look at what we humans are doing to the planet intelligence at our level may be an evolutionary dead end. And there is not such thing as evolving higher. Species evolve to fill an ecological niche.
Worst of all is the whole Planck level concept. Science has put a limit on the micro. Like saying you can’t sail past the horizon or you’ll fall off the earth. This flies in the face of everything sceince supposedly stands for.
No, it doesn’t. The Planck limit is well established and works. Science has not put a limit on anything. Scientists are merely observing the universe and working with what they find.
And I’ll keep it to a simple example - for
the our universe to work inflation needs to be exact to a quintillionth of a point.
Fixed that one for you.
My gut tells me something is guiding it. Why is that difficult to accept?
That is difficult to accept because gut feelings are not evidence.
But when you do look deeper into evolution you find some paradoxes. One being each link in the evolutionary chain has its own universe. And all are projections of our human consciousness.
Wow. Each link in the evolutionary chain has its own universe? And they are merely projections of our consciousness? You are talking nonsense here.
I could go on, but anyone reading this thread with an open mind should see the problems in your thinking. And the physicist your keep referring to as “Hawkings” is named “Hawking.”