Yeah, I’m with George. If ‘?” is a variable, it varies from ‘-3+’ to ‘+6+’ so that:
3-3+3 = 3
3-2+3 = 4
3-1+3 = 5
...
3+6+3 = 12

The image with the triangles… hummmm… three sided black triangles converted to black and red triangles that change position to produce objects with more than three sides?

Yeah, I’m with George. If ‘?” is a variable, it varies from ‘-3+’ to ‘+6+’ so that:
3-3+3 = 3
3-2+3 = 4
3-1+3 = 5
...
3+6+3 = 12

The image with the triangles… hummmm… three sided black triangles converted to black and red triangles that change position to produce objects with more than three sides?

How is this a new basis for Mathematics?

your form is a-d+b=c (a+d+b=c) ,I never said that there is a third number (d) and that there are two mathematical operations (addition and subtraction)
there is no solution in the current mathematics :
1.3+[0]3=3
2.3+[1]3=4
3.3+[2]3=5
4. 3+[3]3=6 or 3+3=6 5.33Rd1(6)d2(7)+3=7 6.33Rd1(6)d2(8 )+3=8 7.33Rd1(6)d2(9)+3=9 8.33Rd1(6)d2(10)+3=10 9.33Rd1(6)d2(12)+3=12
(1,2,3,4) - there are several types of addition in the set N
(5,6,7,8,9) - that there are dynamic numbers, where this can add

1 Mathematics Space
We’ll tell mathematical space with two initial geometric object that can not
prove.
1.Natural geometric object - natural along .
2.Real geometric objects - real alongs . 1.1 Natural along
In the picture there is a natural geometric object along (AB), it has a beginning (A)
and end (B) - this property natural long’ll call point.

to explain many things, so we’ll get to it ———- 2 Natural Mathematics 2.1,along , one-way infinite along the (semi-line) “1”
“1”-from any previous evidence (axioms), a new proof
Theorem-Two (more) natural longer merge points in the direction of the first AB
longer natural.

EVIDENCE - Natural long (AB, BC) are connected - we get along AC.

2.2 Numeral along, numeric point “2.1”
Theorem-character mark points on the one-way infinite
long (A, B, C, ...), replace the labels {(0), (0.1), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 ), ...}
which are set circular and positionally.

They can’t pass even the internet forums review. The question in his OP makes zero sense. And I am definitely not a trained mathematician, so if I say it I imagine it counts.

2.4 Mobile Number “2.2,2.3”
Theorem-Natural numbers can be specified and other numerical
point other than the point numeric 0th
Proof - Value (length) numeric point (0) and numeric point (2)
the number 2

Darron is right to suggest a warning here, mmm. This forum is not a personal blog, it’s a place for discussion and inquiry. Material not relevant to that aim is best pursued elsewhere. If you have something for discussion let us know, but I don’t think there are any trained mathematicians here, so if you want to get informed opinions about your work, you should send it to them. Thanks.