1 of 2
1
Philosophy ofl Mathamatics—metaphysical
Posted: 05 February 2013 07:12 PM   [ Ignore ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  97
Joined  2012-12-01

Objectivity is a semantic/concept of philosophy, science, physics and math;

Mass/Matter as an object is one dimensional; Space as an object is one dimensional;

Time as an object is one dimensional, Transformation as an object is one dimensional,

Observation as an object is one dimensional—

Relating their Interactions to Existence actualizes our Being Here


Are these interactions a path to fourth dimensional Being?

[ Edited: 06 March 2013 04:33 PM by arnoldg ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 February 2013 08:47 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4619
Joined  2007-10-05

happy_smiley_face_yawning_magnets-p147126867307313563en8uh_210.jpg

 Signature 

“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”
Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 February 2013 10:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5178
Joined  2010-06-16

Well put, Darron.

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 February 2013 08:38 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  97
Joined  2012-12-01

ignored by CFI

Try asking me questions about what you want to understand,

From the knowledge that every second is new in our lives?

[ Edited: 01 March 2013 08:30 PM by arnoldg ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 February 2013 08:44 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4619
Joined  2007-10-05

I would start by asking what, exactly, you are trying to say. Your post makes no sense. Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. How is that the result of three dimensions?

 Signature 

“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”
Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 February 2013 11:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  97
Joined  2012-12-01

ignored by CFI

Have you any thoughts about what Being is?

[ Edited: 01 March 2013 08:31 PM by arnoldg ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 February 2013 06:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5178
Joined  2010-06-16

While Darron said it more succinctly and dramatically than I shall, I believe your posts are nonsense.

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 February 2013 08:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4619
Joined  2007-10-05
Occam. - 09 February 2013 06:30 PM

While Darron said it more succinctly and dramatically than I shall, I believe your posts are nonsense.

Occam

Especially since he reworded his original post to change the meaning. He is not only spouting nonsense, he is dishonest.

Edit: changed “wording” to “meaning” to eliminate redundancy and clarify what I was thinking.

[ Edited: 10 February 2013 07:48 AM by DarronS ]
 Signature 

“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”
Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 February 2013 06:31 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1283
Joined  2011-03-12

Objectivity is a result of three dimensions
(one and two dimensions are fractional)
Observation as an object is one dimensional,
Nature as an object is one dimensional,
Time as an object is one dimensional,
Combined, our Life has become their result.
Is this combination a path to fourth dimensional being?

Fifty words used to say nothing.

 Signature 

Question authority and think for yourself. Big Brother does not know best and never has.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 February 2013 08:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  97
Joined  2012-12-01

we don`t live in one or two dimensional worlds

you need ingredients for three dimensions

I have referenced, nature—observation—time

as a—modern—foundation of philosophy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 February 2013 01:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5178
Joined  2010-06-16

So what!!!

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 February 2013 07:24 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1283
Joined  2011-03-12

we don`t live in one or two dimensional worlds

you need ingredients for three dimensions

I have referenced, nature—observation—time

as a—modern—foundation of philosophy

Twenty seven words to say nothing. At least you’re keeping it brief.

 Signature 

Question authority and think for yourself. Big Brother does not know best and never has.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 February 2013 07:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4619
Joined  2007-10-05
Occam. - 10 February 2013 01:53 PM

So what!!!

Occam

Isn’t that a Miles Davis tune?

 Signature 

“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”
Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 February 2013 08:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  15305
Joined  2006-02-14

arnoldg, we really do require members here to engage rationally by posting things that can be at least understood at some basic level, and by reacting to questions with an apparent attempt at clarity and rational development. Otherwise posting ends up simply wasting everyone’s time. I think if these topics interest you, you should try to get straight about what you are trying to say, and engage critically with questioning. Otherwise your posts here fall afoul of Rule 3(h), in that there is no meaningful development or responsive discussion. Thanks for the understanding.

 Signature 

Doug

-:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:-

El sueño de la razón produce monstruos

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 February 2013 02:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  97
Joined  2012-12-01

Doug (CFI),  thank you for letting me openly question if Observation interacts with—-

Matter, Space,Time and Transformation as equal objects in the Cosmos Universe.

Can some philosophers use maths` practice (through) syntactic and semantic predicates,

as descriptive words for pursuing the love of wisdom and truth?

[ Edited: 04 March 2013 09:31 AM by arnoldg ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 February 2013 09:44 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1283
Joined  2011-03-12

Doug (CFI),  thank you for letting me openly question if Observation and Nature are equal interacting objects in the Cosmos/Universe

That’s not what he did, arnoldg. Suggest you read what he actually wrote.

 Signature 

Question authority and think for yourself. Big Brother does not know best and never has.

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1