Philosophy ofl Mathamatics—metaphysical
Posted: 05 February 2013 07:12 PM
[ Ignore ]
Jr. Member
Total Posts: 97
Joined 2012-12-01
Objectivity is a semantic/concept of philosophy, science, physics and math;
Mass/Matter as an object is one dimensional; Space as an object is one dimensional;
Time as an object is one dimensional, Transformation as an object is one dimensional,
Observation as an object is one dimensional—
Relating their Interactions to Existence actualizes our Being Here
[ Edited: 06 March 2013 04:33 PM by arnoldg ]
Posted: 05 February 2013 08:47 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 3946
Joined 2007-10-05
Signature
“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Posted: 06 February 2013 10:53 AM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 2 ]
Moderator
Total Posts: 4483
Joined 2010-06-16
Signature
Succinctness, clarity’s core.
Posted: 07 February 2013 08:38 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 3 ]
Jr. Member
Total Posts: 97
Joined 2012-12-01
ignored by CFI
Try asking me questions about what you want to understand,
From the knowledge that every second is new in our lives?
[ Edited: 01 March 2013 08:30 PM by arnoldg ]
Posted: 07 February 2013 08:44 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 3946
Joined 2007-10-05
I would start by asking what, exactly, you are trying to say. Your post makes no sense. Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. How is that the result of three dimensions?
Signature
“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Posted: 08 February 2013 11:29 AM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 5 ]
Jr. Member
Total Posts: 97
Joined 2012-12-01
ignored by CFI
Have you any thoughts about what Being is?
[ Edited: 01 March 2013 08:31 PM by arnoldg ]
Posted: 09 February 2013 06:30 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 6 ]
Moderator
Total Posts: 4483
Joined 2010-06-16
While Darron said it more succinctly and dramatically than I shall, I believe your posts are nonsense.
Occam
Signature
Succinctness, clarity’s core.
Posted: 09 February 2013 08:30 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 3946
Joined 2007-10-05
Occam. - 09 February 2013 06:30 PM
While Darron said it more succinctly and dramatically than I shall, I believe your posts are nonsense.
Occam
Especially since he reworded his original post to change the meaning. He is not only spouting nonsense, he is dishonest.
Edit: changed “wording” to “meaning” to eliminate redundancy and clarify what I was thinking.
[ Edited: 10 February 2013 07:48 AM by DarronS ]
Signature
“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Posted: 10 February 2013 06:31 AM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 1185
Joined 2011-03-12
Objectivity is a result of three dimensions
Fifty words used to say nothing.
Signature
Question not
Posted: 10 February 2013 08:55 AM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 9 ]
Jr. Member
Total Posts: 97
Joined 2012-12-01
we don`t live in one or two dimensional worlds
you need ingredients for three dimensions
I have referenced, nature—observation—time
as a—modern—foundation of philosophy
Posted: 10 February 2013 01:53 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 10 ]
Moderator
Total Posts: 4483
Joined 2010-06-16
Signature
Succinctness, clarity’s core.
Posted: 10 February 2013 07:24 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 1185
Joined 2011-03-12
we don`t live in one or two dimensional worlds
you need ingredients for three dimensions
I have referenced, nature—observation—time
as a—modern—foundation of philosophy
Twenty seven words to say nothing. At least you’re keeping it brief.
Signature
Question not
Posted: 10 February 2013 07:50 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 3946
Joined 2007-10-05
Occam. - 10 February 2013 01:53 PM
So what!!!
Occam
Isn’t that a Miles Davis tune?
Signature
“In the beginning, God created the universe. This has made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.”The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Posted: 10 February 2013 08:29 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 13 ]
Administrator
Total Posts: 15175
Joined 2006-02-14
arnoldg, we really do require members here to engage rationally by posting things that can be at least understood at some basic level, and by reacting to questions with an apparent attempt at clarity and rational development. Otherwise posting ends up simply wasting everyone’s time. I think if these topics interest you, you should try to get straight about what you are trying to say, and engage critically with questioning. Otherwise your posts here fall afoul of Rule 3(h)
Signature
Doug
-:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:-
El sueño de la razón produce monstruos
Posted: 11 February 2013 02:01 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 14 ]
Jr. Member
Total Posts: 97
Joined 2012-12-01
Doug (CFI), thank you for letting me openly question if Observation interacts with—-
Matter, Space,Time and Transformation as equal objects in the Cosmos Universe.
Can some philosophers use maths` practice (through) syntactic and semantic predicates,
as descriptive words for pursuing the love of wisdom and truth?
[ Edited: 04 March 2013 09:31 AM by arnoldg ]
Posted: 11 February 2013 09:44 PM
[ Ignore ]
[ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
Total Posts: 1185
Joined 2011-03-12
Doug (CFI), thank you for letting me openly question if Observation and Nature are equal interacting objects in the Cosmos/Universe
That’s not what he did, arnoldg. Suggest you read what he actually wrote.
Signature
Question not
