Write4U - Then you have not understood a word I have said and what’s worse you have not checked out David Bohm, or you would understand that Bohm speaks in terms of Wholeness and Holomovement., exactly the opposite of what you are positing here.
Bohm - (latent excellence which may become reality, Potential)
My apologies then.
Would saying, ‘Latent Excellence/Potential not separable’, carried my point better? Probably not.
It’s just redundant. The definition of potential includes the terms ‘inherent’ and ‘not separable’.
Maybe the problem is the question of Existence. Can “Universal Wholeness” actually be said to exist. Existence, in the usual sense of the word, requires it’s opposite. Non Existence.
How can evidence be gathered in such a case?
The Way that can be told of is not an unvarying way;
The names that can be named are not unvarying names.
It was from the Nameless that Heaven and Earth sprang;
The named is but the mother that rears the ten thousand creatures, each after its kind.
(Tao Te Ching; chap. 1, tr. Waley)
It has a name and it is clearly manifest, The Universe.
You keep trying to name something which does indeed not exist, Heaven.