1 of 2
1
Google Face Map - Porn?
Posted: 01 June 2013 11:08 AM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04

Is it just me? Or does the first Google FaceMap pictured here, seem slightly pornographic?


http://io9.com/an-algorithm-that-finds-face-like-structures-on-the-ear-510075519

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 June 2013 02:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5551
Joined  2010-06-16

Wellll?    This sort of reminds me of the old joke:  A guy goes to a psychiatrist and spends the first hour of evaluation being shown Rorschach ink blots and asked what he sees there.  He sees various sexual things in all of them.  At the end of the session, as he walks out, he asks the therapist, “Hey, Doc, can I have those dirty pictures?”  LOL

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 June 2013 02:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04
Occam. - 02 June 2013 02:13 PM

Wellll?    This sort of reminds me of the old joke:  A guy goes to a psychiatrist and spends the first hour of evaluation being shown Rorschach ink blots and asked what he sees there.  He sees various sexual things in all of them.  At the end of the session, as he walks out, he asks the therapist, “Hey, Doc, can I have those dirty pictures?”  LOL

Occam

Yeah, the version of that joke, that I heard goes like this:

A psychologist gives a guy a Rorshach.  Invariably the subject sees something sexual in every ink blot.  Afterwards, the psychologist says to the guy “I am afraid that you have a sexual obsession.”  The guy says “ME!?. but Doc, YOU’RE the one showing me all the dirty pictures!”

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 03:13 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2715
Joined  2011-04-24

Good grief, I noticed it.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 06:31 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  173
Joined  2011-11-06

I didn’t really notice anything overtly pornographic.

Is there some Georgia O’Keefe vagina thing going on?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 06:42 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04
mid atlantic - 03 June 2013 03:13 AM

Good grief, I noticed it.

Thanks, I thought I might be turning gay in my old age.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 06:43 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04
FinallyDecided - 03 June 2013 06:31 AM

I didn’t really notice anything overtly pornographic.

Is there some Georgia O’Keefe vagina thing going on?

More like George O’Cock.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 06:54 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  173
Joined  2011-11-06
TimB - 03 June 2013 06:43 AM
FinallyDecided - 03 June 2013 06:31 AM

I didn’t really notice anything overtly pornographic.

Is there some Georgia O’Keefe vagina thing going on?

More like George O’Cock.

Being that I am a homosexual, you’d think I would have picked up on that!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 07:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  9301
Joined  2006-08-29

I get these kinds of complaints from clients all the time. Some of them will even see an “i” as phallic. Never had anyone telling me that they found a vagina in my design, though.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 07:11 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04
FinallyDecided - 03 June 2013 06:54 AM
TimB - 03 June 2013 06:43 AM
FinallyDecided - 03 June 2013 06:31 AM

I didn’t really notice anything overtly pornographic.

Is there some Georgia O’Keefe vagina thing going on?

More like George O’Cock.

Being that I am a homosexual, you’d think I would have picked up on that!

You see it now, don’t you?

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 07:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04

I mean it’s right in front of his face for (erect) Penis’s sake!

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 07:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  173
Joined  2011-11-06

Yes, I see it now!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 07:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3333
Joined  2011-11-04
George - 03 June 2013 07:08 AM

I get these kinds of complaints from clients all the time. Some of them will even see an “i” as phallic. Never had anyone telling me that they found a vagina in my design, though.

I hope you didn’t think I was referencing you when I said “More like George O’Cock”.  I was just trying to make a humorous reply to the mention of Georgia O’Keefe….  But, then again, I haven’t seen your designs.

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 June 2013 04:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5551
Joined  2010-06-16
George - 03 June 2013 07:08 AM

I get these kinds of complaints from clients all the time. Some of them will even see an “i” as phallic. Never had anyone telling me that they found a vagina in my design, though.

Your comment reminds me of something I saw about twenty years ago.  My oldest stepson was getting married to a Catholic girl and it was a fancy wedding in a recently built Catholic church. 

As I sat there among many others, I stared at the very large wooden paneling behind the alter.  The panels showed the wood grain quite clearly. The two center panels had obviously been carefully sliced from one piece of wood making them mirror images.  A dark strip of grain from each panel ran down ten jogged about a foot away from the central line, then back again. 

I couldn’t help pointing out how much it duplicated the outline of the human vaginal opening.  My wife and seat mates commented that I had ruined the service for them, because they couldn’t listen to it while staring at the six foot long vaginal representation at the front of the Catholic church.  LOL

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2013 06:56 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4400
Joined  2010-08-15

Back in old days we just looked at clouds to find faces
Or that huge tree in the backyard, that would stare through the window at me as I was trying to fall asleep
(lots of faces in that sucker).  red face


Don’t know about the porn… but with a few tweaks, bet they can do that too   cheese

 Signature 

We need each other, to keep ourselves honest

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 June 2013 07:09 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4400
Joined  2010-08-15
Occam. - 03 June 2013 04:58 PM

I couldn’t help pointing out how much it duplicated the outline of the human vaginal opening.  My wife and seat mates commented that I had ruined the service for them, because they couldn’t listen to it while staring at the six foot long vaginal representation at the front of the Catholic church.  LOL
Occam

LOL

Now you reminded of something my babe showed me a couple weeks ago, had to do some searching but here it is
http://trakia-tours.com/the-cave-womb

oh boy, but in looking for that I found this:
http://www.erotic-nature.com/category/rocks-and-stones/
be forwarded… definitely X rated, but fascinating cool hmm

 Signature 

We need each other, to keep ourselves honest

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1