1 of 4
1
Snowden nominated for Nobel Prize
Posted: 16 July 2013 11:56 AM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2602
Joined  2012-10-27

Edward Snowden Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
By Tal Kopan, Politico
16 July 13
 

Swedish sociology professor has nominated Edward Snowden for the Nobel Peace Prize, saying that awarding the former NSA employee would correct Nobel Committee’s mistake in giving the award to President Barack Obama in 2009.

According to a translation of the letter published by the Daily Mail and RT.com, Umeå University professor Stefan Svallfors wrote the committee that Snowden has made the world safer in releasing information about United States surveillance.

“Edward Snowden has - in a heroic effort at great personal cost - revealed the existence and extent of the surveillance, the U.S. government devotes electronic communications worldwide. By putting light on this monitoring program - conducted in contravention of national laws and international agreements - Edward Snowden has helped to make the world a little bit better and safer,” Svallfors wrote.

Referencing the Nuremberg trials of Nazis, Svallfors says following orders is not an excuse for acting against human rights and freedom, and he praised Snowden’s courage in leaking the information.

Svallfors also noted that Obama was a past recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, which he called a correctable mistake.

“The decision to award the 2013 prize to Edward Snowden would - in addition to being well justified in itself - also help to save the Nobel Peace Prize from the disrepute that incurred by the hasty and ill-conceived decision to award U.S. President Barack Obama 2009 award,” Svallfors said.

Because of Svallfors’s professorship at Umeå, he is one of the people who can submit a nomination to the Nobel organization. However, nominations for 2013 were required to be postmarked by Feb. 1.

It was unclear if the committee would consider Snowden’s nomination for 2013 anyway. The Nobel Peace Prize website says the committee may sometimes add nominations to the list accrued by Feb. 1, but once names are whittled down into a shortlist, the nomination process is closed. Nominations after the deadline are usually considered the following year.

The committee received a record 259 nominations this year, it said. Prizes are announced in October.

On Monday, WikiLeaks noted that Snowden joins WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and leaker Army Pfc. Bradley Manning in having been nominated for Nobels, but the organization in a series of tweets decried the committee as a “corrupt” tool of foreign policy.


http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/421-national-security/18426-edward-snowden-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 July 2013 01:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4403
Joined  2010-08-15

Ain’t that a kick -
I just heard it myself.

Aren’t those the folks that gave Obama something very special a while back smile


Maybe they are trying to make amends, considering…

Well, OK, no maybe about it. 

ohh Svallfors also noted that Obama was a past recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, which he called a correctable mistake.

“The decision to award the 2013 prize to Edward Snowden would - in addition to being well justified in itself - also help to save the Nobel Peace Prize from the disrepute that incurred by the hasty and ill-conceived decision to award U.S. President Barack Obama 2009 award,” Svallfors said.

=============================================

What are the odds of Snowden winning?

Now I’m not a betting man and don’t know squat about odds - but I’m in for 5 bucks on Snowden taking it.

 Signature 

We need each other, to keep ourselves honest

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2013 11:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  350
Joined  2008-09-10

Well, giving one to the President was silly, as he had done nothing.  Snowden has done something, but it isn’t clear to me he has advanced the cause of peace.  But I fear the good professor’s dream of rescuing the prize from disrepute will not come true, regardless of who the winner is; it fell into disrepute long ago.

 Signature 

“Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain.” 
—F. Schiller

http://theblogofciceronianus.blogspot.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2013 11:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  582
Joined  2010-04-19

I think it’s time to admit that the Nobel Peace Prize has basically lost any real significant meaning by now….

 Signature 

Don’t get set into one form, adapt it and build your own, and let it grow, be like water. Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water. Now you put water in a cup, it becomes the cup; You put water into a bottle it becomes the bottle; You put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.

- Bruce Lee -

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2013 01:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3262
Joined  2011-08-15

Well, giving one to the President was silly, as he had done nothing.  Snowden has done something, but it isn’t clear to me he has advanced the cause of peace.  But I fear the good professor’s dream of rescuing the prize from disrepute will not come true, regardless of who the winner is; it fell into disrepute long ago.

I’m not certain how Snowden advanced the cause of peace by the act of leaking sensitive information concerning the NSA surveillance activities. He did bring it to light and force the government and the people to deal with it but how does that make for a more peaceful World? Will it somehow stop the drones? And, yes the peace prize has been given to recipients leaving people to scratch their heads in bewilderment, e.g. Teddi Roosevelt, also known as our first imperial president and known war hawk. He stopped the brushfire war between Russia and Japan and they handed him the prize. Prior to that he literally started the Spanish-American War just to participate in it, created a bogus country to build a canal and added a corollary to the Monoe Doctrine that allowed for the exploitation of Central America. His was an aggressive foreign policy if you remember his cliche phrase. All that and more by 1906.


Cap’t Jack

 Signature 

One good schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.

Thomas Paine

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2013 04:18 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2602
Joined  2012-10-27

It might make some sense if heads of state and all politicians were disqualified from the Peace Prize.  Keeping peace or creating it is part of their jobs.  It’s laymen who do something substantial to advance world peace who should receive it. The peace prize has become too political. Snowden shouldn’t get it, either.

[ Edited: 18 July 2013 10:02 PM by Lois ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2013 08:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  629
Joined  2013-06-01

Maybe we need a Whistle Blower Award and Gold Metal.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 July 2013 08:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  582
Joined  2010-04-19
MikeYohe - 18 July 2013 08:41 PM

Maybe we need a Whistle Blower Award and Gold Metal.

Unfortunately, the US govt. would likely have it renamed as the “Traitor” award.

 Signature 

Don’t get set into one form, adapt it and build your own, and let it grow, be like water. Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water. Now you put water in a cup, it becomes the cup; You put water into a bottle it becomes the bottle; You put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.

- Bruce Lee -

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 July 2013 08:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  350
Joined  2008-09-10
Thevillageatheist - 18 July 2013 01:22 PM

Well, giving one to the President was silly, as he had done nothing.  Snowden has done something, but it isn’t clear to me he has advanced the cause of peace.  But I fear the good professor’s dream of rescuing the prize from disrepute will not come true, regardless of who the winner is; it fell into disrepute long ago.

I’m not certain how Snowden advanced the cause of peace by the act of leaking sensitive information concerning the NSA surveillance activities. He did bring it to light and force the government and the people to deal with it but how does that make for a more peaceful World? Will it somehow stop the drones? And, yes the peace prize has been given to recipients leaving people to scratch their heads in bewilderment, e.g. Teddi Roosevelt, also known as our first imperial president and known war hawk. He stopped the brushfire war between Russia and Japan and they handed him the prize. Prior to that he literally started the Spanish-American War just to participate in it, created a bogus country to build a canal and added a corollary to the Monoe Doctrine that allowed for the exploitation of Central America. His was an aggressive foreign policy if you remember his cliche phrase. All that and more by 1906.


Cap’t Jack

Yes.  Roosevelt, “the Great American Sissy” as Gore Vidal called him, was certainly a warmonger.

 Signature 

“Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain.” 
—F. Schiller

http://theblogofciceronianus.blogspot.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 July 2013 11:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2717
Joined  2011-04-24

The Nobel committee is probably trying to regain relevancy. Snowdon should tell them to shove it.

 Signature 

Raise your glass if you’re wrong…. in all the right ways.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 July 2013 10:02 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4576
Joined  2008-08-14
mid atlantic - 19 July 2013 11:11 PM

The Nobel committee is probably trying to regain relevancy. Snowdon should tell them to shove it.

Regain relevancy to suit whom?  Bloggers?  Pundits?  Biased media outlets?  Crows?
I wasn’t aware myself that the Nobel Prize had lost any relevancy actually.
I thought it was simply an organization that tries to award recognition for endeavors of human achievement in culture and science and humanities.
Perhaps some of you should contact them and give them your regarded opinion on how to better administer the prizes that they go out of their way to award.

 Signature 

Row row row your boat gently down the stream.  Merrily Merrily merrily merrily life is but a dream!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 July 2013 10:46 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  582
Joined  2010-04-19
VYAZMA - 20 July 2013 10:02 AM
mid atlantic - 19 July 2013 11:11 PM

The Nobel committee is probably trying to regain relevancy. Snowdon should tell them to shove it.

Regain relevancy to suit whom?  Bloggers?  Pundits?  Biased media outlets?  Crows?
I wasn’t aware myself that the Nobel Prize had lost any relevancy actually.
I thought it was simply an organization that tries to award recognition for endeavors of human achievement in culture and science and humanities.
Perhaps some of you should contact them and give them your regarded opinion on how to better administer the prizes that they go out of their way to award.

Well, yeah, everyone knows what the Nobel Peace prize was FOR. And sure, they could give it to whomever they want. They could give it to a dog if they want. They could give it to a nearby tree stump. But that’s completely beside the point. It’s a prize that is meant to garner strong public recognition. So while the public may or may not have any say so in the matter, it doesn’t necessarily follow that their opinion is irrelevant. Otherwise, Professor Svallfors wouldn’t be speaking so apologetically about their “hasty and ill-conceived decision” to give it Obama in 2009.

The NPP is meant to be a shining symbol of tireless and sacrificial work towards human societal progress. Even Obama supporters (like me at the time) were scratching our heads a bit when it was offered to him after he won the election. If my memory serves me correctly, I don’t think he had been in office for even two weeks at the time. And while I have defended Snowden’s recklessness, I find myself once again scratching my head. Snowden? Really?

Things like this make me wonder if the NPP is becoming more of a political tool than what it is meant to symbolize. Or perhaps it’s just a popularity contest now. I mean, really, the people who tend to get the award are usually those who have put in some serious work. You don’t just get it because a bunch of people like you. So the only conclusion I can come to is that they are indeed trying to regain their relevancy with the public.

But again, sure, they don’t have to check with me in order to determine who to give it to.  But it’s relevancy and prestige is partially, if not completely, dependent on public recognition of the prize. At least, that’s how it’s evolved.

[ Edited: 20 July 2013 10:55 AM by Cloak ]
 Signature 

Don’t get set into one form, adapt it and build your own, and let it grow, be like water. Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water. Now you put water in a cup, it becomes the cup; You put water into a bottle it becomes the bottle; You put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.

- Bruce Lee -

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 July 2013 11:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Member
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  150
Joined  2012-07-25

vyazma- Such a snarky little response….knee-jerk reaction to something that you have not devoted much time or thought to.
Barack Obama- for extraordinary efforts to bring about peace…....blah, blah blah
IPCC for bringing truth about global warming…....blah blah blah…...
Un and kofi anon for bringing about world peace .....wow imagine there are no more wars.
Mother theresa for helping to keep Indian kids sick and poor because Christ loves the little children so much that suffering is salvation…...wow
The Nobel Peace Prize is a big butt-kissing joke award…....my opinion only of course….but accurate never the less…..

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 July 2013 12:18 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4576
Joined  2008-08-14

Cloak-Otherwise, Professor Svallfors wouldn’t be speaking so apologetically about their “hasty and ill-conceived decision” to give it Obama in 2009.

I don’t know how he could make those comments apologetically..he doesn’t give the award, he only offers his opinion on who should get the award.
Apparently he offers his opinions on who deserved the award and who didn’t too.

The NPP is meant to be a shining symbol of tireless and sacrificial work towards human societal progress. Even Obama supporters (like me at the time) were scratching our heads a bit when it was offered to him after he won the election. If my memory serves me correctly, I don’t think he had been in office for even two weeks at the time. And while I have defended Snowden’s recklessness, I find myself once again scratching my head. Snowden? Really?

Obama was a symbol of a nation finally emerging from the possible final vestiges of an apartheid, slave legacy state, with a huge history of racial bias and
discrimination and racial human rights abuses. They chose Obama as the symbol of this emergence, and as a singular person who had the ability to accomplish this
political feat in the face of such a legacy.  I got it.
To me the political tool is this Swedish Professor.  That’s obvious! Obama doesn’t live up to his political expectations, Snowden does. Hmmnn…

So the only conclusion I can come to is that they are indeed trying to regain their relevancy with the public.

How did they lose their relevancy with the public? What exactly caused them to lose relevancy?
And what are the doing to regain this relevancy?  Could you fill me in on this?

 

But it’s relevancy and prestige is partially, if not completely, dependent on public recognition of the prize. At least, that’s how it’s evolved.

How much of the public is aware of the prize in the first place?  It’s a world wide prize. So how much of the world public is aware of the prize or the US public?
The scientists, authors and politicians maybe dependent(somewhat) on the recognition from receiving the prize, but how dependent is the NPP Body on recognition from the public? Really, how dependent are they on recognition from the public?
You think they will stop giving it out or people will stop accepting the award if the public doesn’t recognize it’s relevancy?

 Signature 

Row row row your boat gently down the stream.  Merrily Merrily merrily merrily life is but a dream!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 July 2013 12:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4576
Joined  2008-08-14
sine dues - 20 July 2013 11:05 AM

vyazma- Such a snarky little response….knee-jerk reaction to something that you have not devoted much time or thought to.
Barack Obama- for extraordinary efforts to bring about peace…....blah, blah blah
IPCC for bringing truth about global warming…....blah blah blah…...
Un and kofi anon for bringing about world peace .....wow imagine there are no more wars.
Mother theresa for helping to keep Indian kids sick and poor because Christ loves the little children so much that suffering is salvation…...wow
The Nobel Peace Prize is a big butt-kissing joke award…....my opinion only of course….but accurate never the less…..

How boorish.
I suppose you have overly high expectations of sprinkles and rainbows.
But your probably just another fickle crow, spouting your tiny opinions within the delineated choruses of the blog-o-sphere.

 Signature 

Row row row your boat gently down the stream.  Merrily Merrily merrily merrily life is but a dream!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 July 2013 01:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3262
Joined  2011-08-15

Yes.  Roosevelt, “the Great American Sissy” as Gore Vidal called him, was certainly a warmonger.

I wonder what Roosevelt’s reaction to THAT comment would have been as he said pubically that President Wilson had “the backbone of a chocolate eclair” for not joining the allies in World War I. He wanted to lead another charge before he died. Undoubtedly Roosevelt would have considered Snowden an egregious coward and traitor.


Cap’t Jack

 Signature 

One good schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.

Thomas Paine

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 4
1