So why do CFI claim to be investigators of the paranormal if they can’t detect it?
Does CFI investigate the paranormal? I thought someone explained that CFI investigates “claims” of the paranormal.
What makes the skeptical community think they have the ability to find the scientific evidence required to make the paranormal a known scientific fact?
Has the skeptical community (who are these guys?) made the claim to have the ability to find scientific evidence required to make the paranormal a known scientific fact? Are you part of the skeptical community? You seem to have the ability to make the paranormal a known scientific fact. You have had the experience, no? I must admit I am impressed.
If the paranormal has made a visitation to me then why must I be placed on the lunatic fringe junk heap?
How could anyone place you on the lunatic fringe heap when they don’t know yet about the paranormal visitation you experienced?
Please do tell me about it.
So critical thinking is a very weak tool when dismissing the existence of paranormal activity.
Again, I have not seen anyone (including Hitchins) outright dismiss the existence of paranormal activity.
There are questions that must be answered, else how can one convince and /or teach another how to recognize these activities? Don’t you agree?
I did state that IMO something Supernatural is by definition not Natural (observable), but I am open to being taught. In fact I must admit I am curious. Would do me the favor of explaining your visitation, and thereby backing up your claim?