Science proves Freddie Mercury’s voice kicked ass.
Posted: 25 April 2016 06:08 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6516
Joined  2010-08-15

Well it’s nice to know that my fascination with Freddie is well founded. 

Why Freddie Mercury’s Voice Was So Great, As Explained By Science
April 25, 2016
Heard on All Things Considered
http://www.npr.org/2016/04/25/475611808/why-freddie-mercurys-voice-was-so-great-as-explained-by-science

_____________

Original Article - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/14015439.2016.1156737

Freddie Mercury—acoustic analysis of speaking fundamental frequency, vibrato, and subharmonics
The article meta after title will be split in order to highlight authors

DOI:10.3109/14015439.2016.1156737
Christian T. Herbst, Stellan Hertegard, Daniel Zangger-Borch & Per-Åke Lindestad=

Abstract
Freddie Mercury was one of the twentieth century’s best-known singers of commercial contemporary music. This study presents an acoustical analysis of his voice production and singing style, based on perceptual and quantitative analysis of publicly available sound recordings. Analysis of six interviews revealed a median speaking fundamental frequency of 117.3 Hz, which is typically found for a baritone voice.

Analysis of voice tracks isolated from full band recordings suggested that the singing voice range was 37 semitones within the pitch range of F#2 (about 92.2 Hz) to G5 (about 784 Hz). Evidence for higher phonations up to a fundamental frequency of 1,347 Hz was not deemed reliable. Analysis of 240 sustained notes from 21 a-cappella recordings revealed a surprisingly high mean fundamental frequency modulation rate (vibrato) of 7.0 Hz, reaching the range of vocal tremor.

Quantitative analysis utilizing a newly introduced parameter to assess the regularity of vocal vibrato corroborated its perceptually irregular nature, suggesting that vibrato (ir)regularity is a distinctive feature of the singing voice. Imitation of subharmonic phonation samples by a professional rock singer, documented by endoscopic high-speed video at 4,132 frames per second, revealed a 3:1 frequency locked vibratory pattern of vocal folds and ventricular folds.”

Personally I think they are just scratching the surface, but I’m no scientist.

 Signature 

We need each other, to keep ourselves honest

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 April 2016 07:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6640
Joined  2007-10-05

I suddenly feel the need to crank up my stereo and listen to some Queen. I’ll wait until tomorrow when my wife isn’t home. My amp goes to 11.

 Signature 

You cannot have a rational discussion with someone who holds irrational beliefs.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 April 2016 08:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5257
Joined  2011-11-04

Maybe just a bit, right now.  Hey, it’s for science.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0omja1ivpx0

 Signature 

As a fabrication of our own consciousness, our assignations of meaning are no less “real”, but since humans and the fabrications of our consciousness are routinely fraught with error, it makes sense, to me, to, sometimes, question such fabrications.

Profile