DarronS - Of course there is no objective proof that murdering babies is evil. So what?
So there are a great many, perhaps the large majority, that disagree with you and I on this point.
Once again, so what? When pressed those people could not offer any objective proof, so they are wrong about that point even though the vast majority agree that murdering babies is evil, which is the important point.
As any manipulative person, you offer nothing constructive, just criticisms and annoying questions.
I agree with every rational argument about morality you just made. You simply are not aware of the full context of the thread(s) at issue.
Which threads are those?
Are you still mad because glaciers on the inhabited continents are not essential to human water supplies?
No, I’m not mad. I’m annoyed because you have a history of posting useless comments such as, “Ok, please provide your absolutely provable, demonstrably objective, provably real, basis for the the statement ‘murdering babies is evil’.” You agree murdering babies is evil, you agree there is no objective proof of such, yet you ask for just that. When you get down to it there is no absolute truth outside mathematics and logic, and even in those disciplines you have to start with agreed-upon postulates to prove anything. Murdering babies is an ethical issue, and there is no such thing as an absolute objective truth in ethics, so asking for such is a distraction from rational discussion.