Is reality real?
Posted: 25 July 2017 01:58 PM   [ Ignore ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  74
Joined  2015-02-28

Is Reality Real?

We all, or least the great majority of us, know what reality is; we also know that it is often difficult to find and often in contest, but for the most part, whether we admit it or not, even to ourselves, we know what is not real. What is real is the truth and nothing but the truth without rationalization, and alternate definitions and explanations. It is a true thing or situation that exists or has existed, a real event that is happening or has happened. It is the hard, unvarnished facts, the elusive quarry of law and science, the real McCoy, the Truth: a real fact. We all know almost instinctively what reality is, it is what we live with, it is the basis of our technical civilization and we all seek it and use it. Often, however, we choose not to understand and work with it; but to find ways to get around it, to deny it, to escape from it, and to protect our own interests from it.

Actually, circumvention of truth is not something that human beings have invented, it is just an aspect of the existence of life that through our intelligence and interactive societies and cultures, we have come close to perfecting the manipulation and denial of truth. Lies and deception have evolved as an integral part of all life, plant and animal. Yeah, roll your eyes at that assertion, but it is, for want of a better definition, The Truth.

For example, a squirrel, a delightful little beast that lives among us, feeds largely on a seasonal food, acorns and other seeds and nuts, a diet of largess and scarcity. So to protect from want in the future, our little squirrel buries many acorns in the ground around its area. It “squirrels” away as much of the excess that it can hide away from the competition in preparation for times of scarcity. Now if you were to ask, “Mr. Squirrel, where did you hide those acorns?”, and if he could answer, of course you would expect him to say, “Huh, acorns?, I don’t see no acorns, they ain’t around here no more.” and then sit up, put his front paws on his fat little belly and say, “Gee, I’m hungry, you got any acorns on you?” But of course Mr. Squirrel wouldn’t do that, because, well, he’s a squirrel, not a human. His deceptions are instinctive behavior and not calculated lies and deceits.

And in another more direct and dire form of deception, there is the frogfish, a lump of a fish covered with fleshy flaps and appendages that disguise its form and that sits very, very still on rocky bottoms in the sea and looks for all the world like just another rock or sponge even it’s eyes disguised in its coloration. But it is not totally inert, it has a wiggly appendage, the illicium or “rod” developed from the first dorsal spine that has on its end an esca or “lure” that has the look and action of a wormlike small creature that a little fish would find quite appetizing. The great deception of the frogfish is telling the world, “Hey, I’m just a funny little lump grown-over with algae, but look, there’s a delightful little worm here that is yours for the taking, come and get it.” And when the little fish takes the lump up on that invitation and gets just close enough, a huge mouth explodes from the lump in 6 milliseconds, the mouth cavity enlarges in size by 12 times pulling the hapless little fish, who only wanted a little worm for dinner, into a huge maw of the eat and/or be eaten ecology of life on the reefs. Survival in nature is dependent on deception, stealth, secrecy, camouflage, and misdirection, as well as, if not more than speed, keen senses, and physical strength.

Even plants deceive. The plant world is replete with plants that pretend in color, form, secretions, and growth to attract insects, to effect pollination, induce insects to effect pollination, grow spines to prevent grazing, develop toxins to prevent or reduce growth of other plants and invasion of insects, and hide from predation through coloration and mimicry. Plants are the great deceivers in the role call of life on Earth, although some might argue, or observe, that humanity is narrowing the gap.

It is the human species, above all other life, that has the capacity to understand and manipulate reality. Not actually manipulate or change what is real, just the ability within a government, organization, and/or culture to decide what is and what is not reality, and to create a false reality that best serves them.  Ever since humanity developed the capacity to say to a wandering tribe that entered their territory, “Just over that hill by the stream is a cave where you can live near fruit trees and woods with lots of deer and rabbits.”; neglecting to mention that that is also where the stream dries up and tigers and leopards live. Lies, deception, murder, theft, embezzlement, defamation, and all manner of betrayal and treachery are the threads that wind through the history of humanity. They are the threads of self interest, individual and family power, sexual conquest, money, and ego. Unfortunately, these threads are stronger and longer than the ties that bind us in compassion and charity. and, despite safeguards, they also wind through the human organizations that genuinely profess religion, compassion, government, industry, and health and welfare. But through it all, however disguised and suppressed, there is reality. The human capacity for deception and manipulation of reality may well be an evolutionary trait with immense survival significance.

Reality, as it applies to humanity, is nowhere as confused and lost as it is in religion. In religion, reality depends upon vague interpretations of history, story tellers, self interests, wishful thinking to the extreme, and evolving cultures through time and change. For example take the following two statements:

God is Great, Allahu Akba (in Arabic), which in Islam, is a foundational declaration of the accepted reality of the identity of God that is the basis for the Islamic faith.

Jesus Saves, is a foundational declaration of the accepted reality of Christianity that defines the belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ that is basis for the Christian faith.

These two religions, Islam and Christianity, in all their sects and divisions, make up the majority of people in the world today, so together they are very significant in the accepted reality of most people alive today. But they are very different in belief and culture. In practice and in their own definitions (unless there are two separate Gods), both statements can not define and describe reality. Only one (or none) can be real. But both claim in absolute terms, and with weapons, that their religion describes actual reality and the other, to be kind, simply does not agree and is in error.  In terms of reality these (if other religions and rejection of religions is not considered) are the two options for describing and defining our reality. Which is a correct description of reality? The essence of reality demands that only one, or none, is an accurate basic characterizations of actual reality. But which is it? Wars have been and are being fought over the answer to this question.

But in analysis of the needs of society/government for micro and macro control of society, actual reality must be “managed” to suit the needs for continued existence of the overriding culture. This is a messy process, and actual reality plays a minor role. Politics is the operative factor. Proper attention must be given to religion, at the very least just acknowledgement that religion exists will often be all that is necessary. And even within organized religion, politics always trumps doctrine.

So what is reality? Does reality really exist? If it does, is it always the same? Or can it change depending on the needs and beliefs of people? Is reality the same now as it was before Homo sapiens evolved? Will reality change in the End Times? Will there be End Times? Does reality exist outside of religion? Basically though, this is the question. Is reality real? If you are younger than 50 years old, the future of humanity may depend on your answer.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2017 02:25 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4070
Joined  2009-10-21

Just happened to have this discussion come up in my feed today. It talks about the ridiculousness of the argument that we are somehow unable to determine what’s real, that because religion comes naturally, that means god exists, but since science is hard, that it is not part of us and less likely to guide us to truth.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 July 2017 11:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  225
Joined  2017-07-06
Martin Moe - 25 July 2017 01:58 PM

Is Reality Real?

We all, or least the great majority of us, know what reality is; we also know that it is often difficult to find and often in contest, but for the most part, whether we admit it or not, even to ourselves, we know what is not real. What is real is the truth and nothing but the truth without rationalization, and alternate definitions and explanations. It is a true thing or situation that exists or has existed, a real event that is happening or has happened. It is the hard, unvarnished facts, the elusive quarry of law and science, the real McCoy, the Truth: a real fact. We all know almost instinctively what reality is, it is what we live with, it is the basis of our technical civilization and we all seek it and use it. Often, however, we choose not to understand and work with it; but to find ways to get around it, to deny it, to escape from it, and to protect our own interests from it.

Actually, circumvention of truth is not something that human beings have invented, it is just an aspect of the existence of life that through our intelligence and interactive societies and cultures, we have come close to perfecting the manipulation and denial of truth. Lies and deception have evolved as an integral part of all life, plant and animal. Yeah, roll your eyes at that assertion, but it is, for want of a better definition, The Truth.

For example, a squirrel, a delightful little beast that lives among us, feeds largely on a seasonal food, acorns and other seeds and nuts, a diet of largess and scarcity. So to protect from want in the future, our little squirrel buries many acorns in the ground around its area. It “squirrels” away as much of the excess that it can hide away from the competition in preparation for times of scarcity. Now if you were to ask, “Mr. Squirrel, where did you hide those acorns?”, and if he could answer, of course you would expect him to say, “Huh, acorns?, I don’t see no acorns, they ain’t around here no more.” and then sit up, put his front paws on his fat little belly and say, “Gee, I’m hungry, you got any acorns on you?” But of course Mr. Squirrel wouldn’t do that, because, well, he’s a squirrel, not a human. His deceptions are instinctive behavior and not calculated lies and deceits.

And in another more direct and dire form of deception, there is the frogfish, a lump of a fish covered with fleshy flaps and appendages that disguise its form and that sits very, very still on rocky bottoms in the sea and looks for all the world like just another rock or sponge even it’s eyes disguised in its coloration. But it is not totally inert, it has a wiggly appendage, the illicium or “rod” developed from the first dorsal spine that has on its end an esca or “lure” that has the look and action of a wormlike small creature that a little fish would find quite appetizing. The great deception of the frogfish is telling the world, “Hey, I’m just a funny little lump grown-over with algae, but look, there’s a delightful little worm here that is yours for the taking, come and get it.” And when the little fish takes the lump up on that invitation and gets just close enough, a huge mouth explodes from the lump in 6 milliseconds, the mouth cavity enlarges in size by 12 times pulling the hapless little fish, who only wanted a little worm for dinner, into a huge maw of the eat and/or be eaten ecology of life on the reefs. Survival in nature is dependent on deception, stealth, secrecy, camouflage, and misdirection, as well as, if not more than speed, keen senses, and physical strength.

Even plants deceive. The plant world is replete with plants that pretend in color, form, secretions, and growth to attract insects, to effect pollination, induce insects to effect pollination, grow spines to prevent grazing, develop toxins to prevent or reduce growth of other plants and invasion of insects, and hide from predation through coloration and mimicry. Plants are the great deceivers in the role call of life on Earth, although some might argue, or observe, that humanity is narrowing the gap.

It is the human species, above all other life, that has the capacity to understand and manipulate reality. Not actually manipulate or change what is real, just the ability within a government, organization, and/or culture to decide what is and what is not reality, and to create a false reality that best serves them.  Ever since humanity developed the capacity to say to a wandering tribe that entered their territory, “Just over that hill by the stream is a cave where you can live near fruit trees and woods with lots of deer and rabbits.”; neglecting to mention that that is also where the stream dries up and tigers and leopards live. Lies, deception, murder, theft, embezzlement, defamation, and all manner of betrayal and treachery are the threads that wind through the history of humanity. They are the threads of self interest, individual and family power, sexual conquest, money, and ego. Unfortunately, these threads are stronger and longer than the ties that bind us in compassion and charity. and, despite safeguards, they also wind through the human organizations that genuinely profess religion, compassion, government, industry, and health and welfare. But through it all, however disguised and suppressed, there is reality. The human capacity for deception and manipulation of reality may well be an evolutionary trait with immense survival significance.

Reality, as it applies to humanity, is nowhere as confused and lost as it is in religion. In religion, reality depends upon vague interpretations of history, story tellers, self interests, wishful thinking to the extreme, and evolving cultures through time and change. For example take the following two statements:

God is Great, Allahu Akba (in Arabic), which in Islam, is a foundational declaration of the accepted reality of the identity of God that is the basis for the Islamic faith.

Jesus Saves, is a foundational declaration of the accepted reality of Christianity that defines the belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ that is basis for the Christian faith.

These two religions, Islam and Christianity, in all their sects and divisions, make up the majority of people in the world today, so together they are very significant in the accepted reality of most people alive today. But they are very different in belief and culture. In practice and in their own definitions (unless there are two separate Gods), both statements can not define and describe reality. Only one (or none) can be real. But both claim in absolute terms, and with weapons, that their religion describes actual reality and the other, to be kind, simply does not agree and is in error.  In terms of reality these (if other religions and rejection of religions is not considered) are the two options for describing and defining our reality. Which is a correct description of reality? The essence of reality demands that only one, or none, is an accurate basic characterizations of actual reality. But which is it? Wars have been and are being fought over the answer to this question.

But in analysis of the needs of society/government for micro and macro control of society, actual reality must be “managed” to suit the needs for continued existence of the overriding culture. This is a messy process, and actual reality plays a minor role. Politics is the operative factor. Proper attention must be given to religion, at the very least just acknowledgement that religion exists will often be all that is necessary. And even within organized religion, politics always trumps doctrine.

So what is reality? Does reality really exist? If it does, is it always the same? Or can it change depending on the needs and beliefs of people? Is reality the same now as it was before Homo sapiens evolved? Will reality change in the End Times? Will there be End Times? Does reality exist outside of religion? Basically though, this is the question. Is reality real? If you are younger than 50 years old, the future of humanity may depend on your answer.

Martin,

what pathway do you use to get to the truth?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2017 06:48 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1310
Joined  2005-01-14

It’s times like this that I miss Occam.  He would have said something like, “I read the first three paragraphs and lost interest.  If you want to engage people’s interest in a topic, keep your opening remarks brief and to the point.  Later you can expound on them however you like.”

Er… what was the question again?  smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2017 07:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  74
Joined  2015-02-28

Interesting, A pathway to the truth… Actually, this could be a sort of a loaded question. Often when a question like this is proposed, especially in a religious connotation,  the “truth” has already been defined, and pathway laid out and well marked needing only the consent and agreement of the “questionee” to come to a conclusion. But the subject of my little essay is not Truth, it is reality, and there is a difference, which depending on context and purpose can be negligible or very significant. Truth can be an honest description of reality, or it can be the derived end point of a tortured and complex analysis of fact and fiction designed to reach a specific conclusion. I will assume that you meant how do I determine reality. There is fact and there is theory. Fact is the replicable product of observation and analysis, an accurate description of reality. It can be simple or extremely complex but it is replicable and rational. Theory is based on fact, fact that is well established by replication. Theory can be wrong, and if the facts that support it are found to be in question, then theory is discarded or revised. So my “pathway” to determination of reality is observation and analysis. However, the pursuit of accurate analysis of reality relies on an element of trust. Not trust in the sense of “this is real because I had a dream, or a visit from a spirit”, or trust in the sense of “this was written long ago through divine direction, so it must be true”, or “these facts are basis of my community and culture” so it must be an accurate description of the truth, aka, reality.

In this day and age, over the last few centuries, the art and analysis of science (the scientific method) has redefined how humanity describes the natural world and the place of humanity within the natural world. Things of the spiritual and things of religion are now separate from the analysis of cause and effect that reveals to a great degree how life has evolved and actually works, and how the physical world and universe also evolves and works. Of course this is a work in progress, there is much yet to learn and know. And the “battle” between revelation and the self interests that revealed “knowledge” serves; and sure knowledge that builds through observation, analysis, replication, and confirmation through separate efforts continues.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2017 07:33 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Jr. Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  74
Joined  2015-02-28

Yeah, Occam’s razor, I’ve used that in a few publications. It is a very good guide to concise and meaningful dissertation, especially in this age of internet communication. I’ll keep that in mind, but as a part time writer of book length exposition, old habits are hard to break.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2017 07:56 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  244
Joined  2015-12-10

The discussion or reality is not nearly as valuable as that of cause and effect or fractal systems. Once a person gets te the level of ability where they can understand everything in a cause and effect manner, religion and moral philosophy (Kant, Plato, Aristotle ...) fad in the face of cause and effect, This is especially true when a human is part of the cause or effect system.

 Signature 

By expanding knowledge of the real, reduce the environmental footprint of of ignorance…in any and every way you most desire.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 July 2017 10:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4070
Joined  2009-10-21

Truth is that which corresponds to reality. Reality is a little harder to define, but has something to do with all that evidence you were talking about.

I think it is one of the biggest lies of the age that we have recently changed our relationship to reality. If you go back over 200,000 years, when we were just another animal, there was no question about what was real. An eclipse or an alien spacecraft were just unusual things that had to be dealt with in the moment. Only after we started living together and helping each other with child rearing did we start to put meaning on these things, did we start wondering why we were helping each other. It could be religion was invented so men could have an excuse to not change a diaper.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 July 2017 06:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4262
Joined  2014-06-20

No, reality is not real, it’s fake. Now shut up.

Lois

 Signature 

[color=red“Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand.”
― George Eliot, Silas Marner[/color]

Profile