3 of 3
3
What catastrophic climate change looks like.
Posted: 27 September 2017 07:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 31 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1610
Joined  2016-12-24

Note, the usual suspects stay far away from this thread.
It must stir a bit of cognitive dissonance so they run and hide. 

Life is so much better within their fantasy bubble.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 September 2017 08:25 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 32 ]
Member
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  130
Joined  2017-09-24

They probably read it and get a secret pleasure knowing they’re bringing such misery to so many lives.

They don’t need to comment on the impacts of their actions, just make sure we don’t change course.

They are clearly psychopaths…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 September 2017 11:47 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 33 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1610
Joined  2016-12-24

gwcc

downer 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Working on another project and came across this. 
May as well touch on the physical roots of the increasingly catastrophic global warming driven cascading consequences we are witnessing throughout the world.

Must-Read Trenberth: How To Relate Climate Extremes to Climate Change
JOE ROMM
MAR 25, 2012
https://thinkprogress.org/must-read-trenberth-how-to-relate-climate-extremes-to-climate-change-fc5c4a4f5b96/

Scientists are frequently asked about an event “Is it caused by climate change?”
The answer is that no events are “caused by climate change” or global warming, but all events have a contribution.
Moreover, a small shift in the mean can still lead to very large percentage changes in extremes.

In reality the wrong question is being asked: the question is poorly posed and has no satisfactory answer.
The answer is that all weather events are affected by climate change global warming (‘climate change’ is the result)
because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than it used to be.

The basic story was also told in Scientific American.

More violent and frequent storms, once merely a prediction of climate models, are now a matter of observation.
Part 1 of a three-part series
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/extreme-weather-caused-by-climate-change/

incidentally, Cascading Consequences would be more appropriate than “climate change” which, if you think, about is a pathetic nothing of a descriptive,
as bland and un-nourishing as white bread.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 September 2017 07:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 34 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1610
Joined  2016-12-24

Taking the Long View: The ‘Forever Legacy’ of Climate Change
Climate change projections often focus on 2100.
But the geological record shows that unless we rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
we will be locking in drastic increases in temperatures and sea levels that will alter the earth not just for centuries, but for millennia.

BY ROB WILDER AND DAN KAMMEN • SEPTEMBER 12, 2017

http://e360.yale.edu/features/taking-the-long-view-the-forever-legacy-of-climate-change

SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
Antarctic Glacier Loses Chunk of Ice Four Times the Size of Manhattan
http://e360.yale.edu/digest/antarctic-glacier-loses-chunk-of-ice-four-times-the-size-of-manhattan

A section of ice more than 100 square miles in size — four times as large as Manhattan — has broken off the Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica.
It is the fifth major calving, or ice loss, event on the glacier since 2000.

... Pine Island alone has the potential to raise global sea level 1.7 feet if it melts completely, The Post reported. In 2015, the glacier lost a piece of ice 220 square miles in size, and recent calving events are originating farther and farther inland, Stef Lhermitte, a satellite observation scientist at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, tweeted.

In a paper published last year ( https://news.osu.edu/news/2016/11/28/pineisland/ ), scientists reported that rifts in the Pine Island Glacier were originating in the middle and underneath its floating ice shelf, not along its face, which is generally how pieces of ice calve from a glacier. The researchers theorized this was because warmer ocean waters are reaching farther underneath the base of the glacier and the ice shelf.

“We predicted that the rifting would result in more frequent calving, which is what’s happening here,” Ian Howat, a climate scientist at Ohio State University and co-author of the 2016 study, told The Post. “If new rifts continue to form progressively inland, the significance to ice shelf retreat would be high.” ...

Oh and okay it’ll take more than +3.5°C to melt all the ice (as I recently claimed) according to experts best estimates   hmmm

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 September 2017 10:07 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 35 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1610
Joined  2016-12-24

San Juan Mayor One-on-One with Anderson Cooper: “HELP US, WE ARE DYING”. #SanJuan @CarmenYulinCruz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DIZu7tTRTg

Trump Brags about Puerto Rico Response as Fed-up survivors plead for Electricity, Water, Fuel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM4ScZa2_JA

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 September 2017 12:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 36 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4314
Joined  2014-06-20
CuthbertJ - 08 September 2017 10:06 AM

Unfortunately none of what you mention matters. Even more unfortunately it’s going to take horrible weather events to change people’s minds. And I think it’s only partially (but still mostly) due to the politization of climate change. If you’ve ever been involved with local politics, so many times things don’t happen, like getting that new stop sign installed, until it’s too late and somebody gets hit or killed. THEN everyone is up in arms as to why it didn’t get done earlier. I guess you call it inate human stupidity and inertia.

If there were weather conditions that destroyed half the world’s land mass and population, the climate deniers who are left will be saying the same thing they say now—that it’s a natural cycle and human activity has nothing to do with it.

Lois

 Signature 

[color=red“Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand.”
― George Eliot, Silas Marner[/color]

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 September 2017 12:17 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 37 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1610
Joined  2016-12-24
LoisL - 30 September 2017 12:15 PM
CuthbertJ - 08 September 2017 10:06 AM

Unfortunately none of what you mention matters. Even more unfortunately it’s going to take horrible weather events to change people’s minds. And I think it’s only partially (but still mostly) due to the politization of climate change. If you’ve ever been involved with local politics, so many times things don’t happen, like getting that new stop sign installed, until it’s too late and somebody gets hit or killed. THEN everyone is up in arms as to why it didn’t get done earlier. I guess you call it inate human stupidity and inertia.

If there were weather conditions that destroyed half the world’s land mass and population, the climate deniers who are left will be saying the same thing they say now—that it’s a natural cycle and human activity has nothing to do with it.

Lois

Nah, they’ll figure out how to blame it on liberals.

Profile
 
 
   
3 of 3
3