Does Anybody Around Here Have Dignity?
Posted: 15 August 2017 03:36 PM   [ Ignore ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  18
Joined  2017-08-15

ekCH6hH.jpg
  YP8JYmB.jpg
  yy9fxJ5.jpg

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 09:48 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  78
Joined  2017-08-06

Ah, the most scientific of all data, “pictures with quotes”, also known as memes to the less sophisticated than thou art.  Memes have completely brainwashed you, kinda ironic since Richard Dawkins is the guy that coined the term, and you are posting memes on a site partnered with him.

 Signature 

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.” - Richard Feynman

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 10:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1577
Joined  2012-04-25

Can we please get rid of this guy. I wouldn’t doubt if he’s a false flag operation so that some alt right site can say look at those lefties, they adore shitler.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 11:02 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4211
Joined  2009-10-21

If you aren’t banned yet, here’s the answer to your question about the right to return a threat of extermination.

All civilized societies allow for self-defense. So, that’s a yes.

All civilized societies have a system for determining if in fact a violent act was self-defense. So, that’s “it depends”.

All civilized societies will unequivocally state that not all violence is justified. Self-defense is about an immediate and real threat. Your memes are about institutional threats, they are scholars who are making statements. I don’t agree with any of them, but I defend their right to speak. Once you start limiting speech, you need to have good reasons. You need to show how the speech is directly related to that real threat thing mentioned earlier.

That’s about all the time I’ll bother spending with you. Good luck having a reasonable conversation with anyone.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 02:27 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  18
Joined  2017-08-15
WaylonCash - 16 August 2017 09:48 AM

Ah, the most scientific of all data, “pictures with quotes”, also known as memes to the less sophisticated than thou art.  Memes have completely brainwashed you, kinda ironic since Richard Dawkins is the guy that coined the term, and you are posting memes on a site partnered with him.

  If you don’t believe any of the quotes, look them up for yourself.  As for what menechem begin said, there is apparently no real “proof” that he said what is shown.  But with all the other scum sucking things they do say, there is no reason to doubt it.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 02:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  18
Joined  2017-08-15
CuthbertJ - 16 August 2017 10:21 AM

Can we please get rid of this guy. I wouldn’t doubt if he’s a false flag operation so that some alt right site can say look at those lefties, they adore shitler.

  How about we play this game.  If I say anything that is untrue, then you can call for me to get banned.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 02:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  18
Joined  2017-08-15
Lausten - 16 August 2017 11:02 AM

If you aren’t banned yet, here’s the answer to your question about the right to return a threat of extermination.

All civilized societies allow for self-defense. So, that’s a yes.

All civilized societies have a system for determining if in fact a violent act was self-defense. So, that’s “it depends”.

All civilized societies will unequivocally state that not all violence is justified. Self-defense is about an immediate and real threat. Your memes are about institutional threats, they are scholars who are making statements. I don’t agree with any of them, but I defend their right to speak. Once you start limiting speech, you need to have good reasons. You need to show how the speech is directly related to that real threat thing mentioned earlier.

That’s about all the time I’ll bother spending with you. Good luck having a reasonable conversation with anyone.

  Spoken like a true idiot.  I suppose you don’t think human caused global warming is real either.  If only this was a forum that allowed any meaningful debate.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 August 2017 04:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4211
Joined  2009-10-21
cultsmasher - 16 August 2017 02:33 PM
Lausten - 16 August 2017 11:02 AM

If you aren’t banned yet, here’s the answer to your question about the right to return a threat of extermination.

All civilized societies allow for self-defense. So, that’s a yes.

All civilized societies have a system for determining if in fact a violent act was self-defense. So, that’s “it depends”.

All civilized societies will unequivocally state that not all violence is justified. Self-defense is about an immediate and real threat. Your memes are about institutional threats, they are scholars who are making statements. I don’t agree with any of them, but I defend their right to speak. Once you start limiting speech, you need to have good reasons. You need to show how the speech is directly related to that real threat thing mentioned earlier.

That’s about all the time I’ll bother spending with you. Good luck having a reasonable conversation with anyone.

  Spoken like a true idiot.  I suppose you don’t think human caused global warming is real either.  If only this was a forum that allowed any meaningful debate.

“Debate” is a word with many definitions. We can’t conduct a formal debate over the internet, not without first finding people we trust to run it,
and I don’t think we’ll agree on that. But, you asked a question, I answered, gave you plenty to interact with, then you call me an idiot.
That fits no definition of debate that I know of. Would you like to debate what “debate” means?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2017 01:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4332
Joined  2014-06-20
Lausten - 16 August 2017 04:35 PM
cultsmasher - 16 August 2017 02:33 PM
Lausten - 16 August 2017 11:02 AM

If you aren’t banned yet, here’s the answer to your question about the right to return a threat of extermination.

All civilized societies allow for self-defense. So, that’s a yes.

All civilized societies have a system for determining if in fact a violent act was self-defense. So, that’s “it depends”.

All civilized societies will unequivocally state that not all violence is justified. Self-defense is about an immediate and real threat. Your memes are about institutional threats, they are scholars who are making statements. I don’t agree with any of them, but I defend their right to speak. Once you start limiting speech, you need to have good reasons. You need to show how the speech is directly related to that real threat thing mentioned earlier.

That’s about all the time I’ll bother spending with you. Good luck having a reasonable conversation with anyone.

  Spoken like a true idiot.  I suppose you don’t think human caused global warming is real either.  If only this was a forum that allowed any meaningful debate.

“Debate” is a word with many definitions. We can’t conduct a formal debate over the internet, not without first finding people we trust to run it,
and I don’t think we’ll agree on that. But, you asked a question, I answered, gave you plenty to interact with, then you call me an idiot.
That fits no definition of debate that I know of. Would you like to debate what “debate” means?

Isn’t it what you use to catch fish?

 Signature 

[color=red“Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand.”
― George Eliot, Silas Marner[/color]

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2017 08:07 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4211
Joined  2009-10-21
LoisL - 17 August 2017 01:59 AM

Isn’t it what you use to catch fish?

Ya, dat’s wat we voose to catch de fish. Ya betcha’

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2017 09:54 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1577
Joined  2012-04-25
cultsmasher - 16 August 2017 02:29 PM
CuthbertJ - 16 August 2017 10:21 AM

Can we please get rid of this guy. I wouldn’t doubt if he’s a false flag operation so that some alt right site can say look at those lefties, they adore shitler.

  How about we play this game.  If I say anything that is untrue, then you can call for me to get banned.

Sure, as long as you first remove your offensive avatar, and make your posts using your own typing, not by pasting in pictures.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2017 08:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1690
Joined  2016-12-24

You can’t even define what Truth is.  And now you think using super size font gives you an added measure of “truth.”  LOL
You’re a sad silly hateful fellow, lost in the mob and trying to shock people. 
I hope you succeed, perhaps that will help them wake up
to what happens when people have learned to accept lies and bigotry without vocally objecting to them.

Given that Trump’s poll numbers seem to remain a solid 1/3 of the voters of this country,
you progressives, leftie types, my fellow children of the intellectual enlightenment
better wake up, this sad, pissed off, not very bright dude is for real and
he wants a fight a hell of a lot more than you dare imagine. ).

Seriously think about Trump’s dedicated deplorables such as this kid who thinks he knows truth,
when he can’t put together his own words to explain why he fells as he does. 
All he is capable of is being part of the mob and spreading the propaganda -
yet he feels he’s superior to all other humans.

Stop kidding yourself he represents nearly a third of our country.

While the GOP continues to do it’s best to ride the monster they created,
desperate to satisfy their ultra rich over-lords -
for whom this dangerous this silly sad sack is just another brick in the wall.

Can you hear them now.  Now what you gonna do?
Remember this joker really does represent a frighteningly huge portion of our population.
Ignoring their deliberate lies and their stated intent to dismantle our government
and turn it over to private business hasn’t done anything but allowed ‘em to thrive and now they’ve tasted blood.

Could be democracies proudest hour, but only if an awful lot more people get motivated,
informed, engaged in our dirty political system.

6 in 10 people who approve of Trump say they’ll never, ever, ever stop approving
By Ryan Struyk, CNN
Updated 5:19 PM ET, Thu August 17, 2017

and so on ...

[ Edited: 17 August 2017 09:04 PM by Citizenschallenge-v.3 ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2017 09:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1690
Joined  2016-12-24

http://www.cnn. com/2017/08/17/politics/trump-approvers-never-stop-approving-poll/index.html

Profile