Guess it takes an outsider to clearly see the party everyone else is engaged in.
Yesterday I came along a fascinating and eye-opening article.
An article that should have been making the rounds two years ago.
This Political Theorist Predicted the Rise of Trumpism.
His Name Was Hunter S. Thompson.
In Hell’s Angels, the gonzo journalist wrote about left-behind people motivated only by “an ethic of total retaliation.” Sound familiar?
By Susan McWilliams DECEMBER 15, 2016
“He came in on his Harley,” Trump said of Walker, “but he doesn’t look like a motorcycle guy.”
“The motorcycle guys,” he added, “like Trump.”
It has been 50 years since Hunter S. Thompson published the definitive book on motorcycle guys:
Hell’s Angels: The Strange and Terrible Saga of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs.
It grew out of a piece first published in The Nation one year earlier.
My grandfather, Carey McWilliams, editor of the magazine from 1955 to 1975, commissioned the piece from Thompson—
it was the gonzo journalist’s first big break, and the beginning of a friendship between the two men that would last until my grandfather died in 1980.
Because of that family connection, I had long known that Hell’s Angels was a political book.
Even so, I was surprised, when I finally picked it up a few years ago, by how prophetic Thompson is and how eerily he anticipates 21st-century American politics.
This year, when people asked me what I thought of the election, I kept telling them to read Hell’s Angels. ...
... After following the motorcycle guys around for months, Thompson concluded that the most striking thing about them was not their hedonism
but their “ethic of total retaliation” against a technologically advanced and economically changing America in which they felt they’d been counted out and left behind.
Thompson saw the appeal of that retaliatory ethic. He claimed that a small part of every human being longs to burn it all down,
especially when faced with great and impersonal powers that seem hostile to your very existence.
In the United States, a place of ever greater and more impersonal powers, the ethic of total retaliation was likely to catch on.
What made that outcome almost certain,
Thompson thought, was the obliviousness of Berkeley, California, types who, from the safety of their cocktail parties,
imagined that they understood and represented the downtrodden.
The Berkeley types, Thompson thought, were not going to realize how presumptuous they had been until
the downtrodden broke into one of those cocktail parties and embarked on a campaign of rape, pillage, and slaughter.
For Thompson, the Angels weren’t important because they heralded a new movement of cultural hedonism,
but because they were the advance guard for a new kind of right-wing politics.
As Thompson presciently wrote in the Nation piece he later expanded on in Hell’s Angels,
that kind of politics is “nearly impossible to deal with” using reason or empathy or awareness-raising or any of the other favorite tools of the left. ...