I shouldn’t respond to your personal attack, but will anyway.
You seem to want to try and attack me personally for my “religious beliefs” re: Scott Peterson. Before your post I knew nothing of Peterson, I merely wanted to debunk your statement that there was “no evidence” in the case. I accept the prosecution’s version of the age of the fetus based on the scientific evidence available, namely an ultrasound and the bones of the fetus. I’ll accept that since you only made conclusory statements about Dr. March and his evidence that you concede that he based the age of the fetus on that babyshower conversation about the pregnancy test (for which there is absolutely no evidentiary support).
If we were looking for a zealot here, I’d pick the one who is taking a leap of faith by relying upon secondhand hearsay to establish the age of the fetus and who created his own one-sided website on the matter.
I made no personal attack. I merely note that you wander around looking for trivialities but cannot overcome any of the factual points I have made.
This is a religious belief not a logical one. Logic says, as it has from the moment the bodies were found, that Laci was the victim of a fetus napper. All hypothetical cases offered which involve her husband fail miserably. Throw out Dr March’s testimony in its entirety and the case against Scott still fails. Assume Devore’s theory is 100% correct and all you prove is what the FBI will tell you - most kidnap victims are killed within hours of abduction. The case against Scott still fails.