5 of 5
5
are
Posted: 09 November 2007 12:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 61 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  178
Joined  2007-06-01

What is this about? (anti-something or other?)  And why are all zarcus’ posts deleted?

 Signature 

“Life is a Blur of Republicans and Meat” - Zippy

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2007 01:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 62 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  15370
Joined  2006-02-14

zarcus had some sort of fit awhile back and deleted his old posts. We Admins and Mods really discourage that sort of behavior for precisely this reason. It makes past conversations nearly impossible to follow.

 Signature 

Doug

-:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:-

El sueño de la razón produce monstruos

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2007 02:09 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 63 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  895
Joined  2007-05-09

Charles, what you can’t tell what we “are” debating. :^]

It was about a poll offered by the New Humanist - Are Dawkins and Hitchens good for Humanism.

Here is a story about it and other surveys by the New Humanist (the Dawkins, Hitchens poll is discussed below the Harris one) - http://newhumanist.org.uk/1613

Profile
 
 
Posted: 20 November 2007 09:38 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 64 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2423
Joined  2007-09-03
zarcus - 09 November 2007 02:09 PM

Charles, what you can’t tell what we “are” debating. :^]

It was about a poll offered by the New Humanist - Are Dawkins and Hitchens good for Humanism.

Here is a story about it and other surveys by the New Humanist (the Dawkins, Hitchens poll is discussed below the Harris one) - http://newhumanist.org.uk/1613

Are Dawkins and Hitchens good for Humanism was sort of the topic—are they unnecessarily polarizing the debate or causing a stereotype of the ‘humanist’ position which will result in a pendulum swing of opinion in resistance to their rhetoric.

Profile
 
 
   
5 of 5
5