CFI mentioned in a science-ID discussion (Banninated)
Posted: 15 December 2007 07:56 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  768
Joined  2007-09-03

http://banninated.blogspot.com/2007/12/dembskis-symmetry-inference.html

Say what you want about the Center for Inquiry in terms of their agenda. Dembski describes them as a “virulently atheistic organization”, and from what little I know about them, there’s not much to dispute in that, beyond Dembski’s typically emotionally-loaded language ("virulently" has got to be bad, doncha know). In any case, I don’t think any “virulence” matters, so long as they are willing to affirm the integrity and value of methodological naturalism—the ‘operating guidelines’ for science as it is effectively practiced.

Not clear what ‘virulent’ is—does CFI infect people with memes?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 December 2007 07:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  119
Joined  2007-09-28

is this why I’ve had a rash for the last couple of months?

Ski.

 Signature 

hmmmmm π

Profile