Apparently the fairly graphic representation of the agonies of the cross were “upsetting the children” and was, in their words, a “put-off.” Now, I’ll admit I’ve been away from Mother Church for awhile, but as an erstwhile good Irish Catholic boy, I seem to recall being told over and over again that the unimaginable agonies of Jesus on the cross were the point of Christianity; his agonies and suffering were what redeemed humanity. Silly little bake-sale Christians; when they say things like “we need a more uplifting and inspiring symbol than execution on a cross,” we realize that they’ve lost any reverence for—hell, any understanding of —the broken, tortured body that for 2000 years was the central tenet of their faith.
A statue of the crucifixion has been taken down from its perch on a church in Sussex because it was scaring local children and deterring worshippers, a vicar admitted today.
Souter, formerly a cell biologist, said: “The crucifix expressed suffering, torment, pain and anguish. It was a scary image, particularly for children. Parents didn’t want to walk past it with their kids, because they found it so horrifying.
“It wasn’t a suitable image for the outside of a church wanting to welcome worshippers. In fact, it was a real put-off.
“We’re all about hope, encouragement and the joy of the Christian faith. We want to communicate good news, not bad news, so we need a more uplifting and inspiring symbol than execution on a cross.”