I explained that 19 is the gematrical value of “one” and “guidance”. 19 is the symbol of the Oneness of God, the most important message in Holy scriptures.
The words “one” and “guidance” seem important because it supports
the idea of God that the Qu’ran promotes. But would you, Pierre,
see it as equally important if the gematrical values of some
negative words were multiples of 19? These words should have
equal import, if they exist in the Qu’ran. What if “two”, “none”,
“lie”, “false”, “abandon”, “murderer”, “infidel”, “Christian”,
“monster” or some word that disagrees with the Qu’ran has an
Arabic gematrical multiple of 19?
I think that you show favoritism for ideas that support the
Qu’ran and have a gematrical multiple of 19. While making your
assertions, Pierre, you never mention counter-points that you
divised and then disprove. That bias is the biggest obstacle that
the people here have to being convinced of your points, Pierre.
Keep in mind Pierre that the data you post is not yours, you didn’t
verify that it is accurate, you could verify it by writing a modern
program that analyzes the Unicode Arabic text of the Qu’ran in
the various ways that you claim. Once made, it can analyze any
electronic text, and the results of “Peter Pan” and such can be
compared to the Qu’ran to see if the Qu’ran is special somehow.
Here is an example of what a biased attitude can produce, we ALL
are susceptible to bias. A protest against Intelligent Design
started a few years ago by drawing a sloppy silly arbitrary clump
of pasta, the web site Venganza is part of that protest.
Many people now see that image occurring in nature. They post the
images to the web site (and its forum under General Discussion)
to prove that people can use their bias to see, even such an
arbitrary shape, in nature. Every child knows that it is fun
to see recognizable shapes in the clouds, and to see scorpions,
crabs, dippers, and hunters in the patterns of stars of the sky.
Many of your points about multiples of 19, Pierre, seem to be
examples of this sort of bias.
In addition the creation is also coded with 19: A german scientist, Dr. plichta, discovered that the periodic table of elements is coded with 19: http://www.submission.org/miracle/19-chemistry.html The earth-moon-sun align perfectly every 19 years, but who cares on this forum? Just another coincidence and baseless numerology!
I am no chemist, but my periodic table has 103 elements (it is old)
marking 90 of them as stable (1-92 excluding elements 43 and 61)
and your web site doesn’t account for the difference between 90
and the (multiple of 9) 81 elements that it claims are connected
to the number 19.
⎲ k / 19 = 215.52631, then subtracting 43 and 61 from the sum
⎳ of k’s and dividing by 19 equals 210.05263.
k=1 Neither result is a multiple of 19.
“That would be without importance in the number theory , if
the second element did not possess two protons, the third three
protons, the fourth four protons etc… In this way all elements
are consecutively represented from 1 to 83 nicely . This proves,
that the nature is very orderly.” (from that last URL)
That does not prove that nature is orderly. Whenever you have a
discrete unit of measurement (an electron, a proton, a kilometer,
a kilogram, a television channel, an audio CD (which might
hold 8, 9, 10, 11 ... songs), ... you will wind up with simple
integer arithmetic! That is what integer arithmetic was invented
to represent, discrete units of 1, the number 1 is the unit, unity.
We humans find integers easier, so we invented them, but real numbers
are more realistic and natural.
The Origin of the Periodic Table is a nice tutorial on the
structure of electron valances. It has a nice java applet that
shows that the pattern of electrons valances is not as simple
as atomic number plus one electron/proton pair equals the
atomic number plus one.