Randy Olson - Don’t Be Such a Scientist
Posted: 05 December 2009 07:37 PM   [ Ignore ]
Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  174
Joined  2007-02-21

Randy Olson is a marine biologist and filmmaker who holds a PhD in biology from Harvard University. A graduate of the U.S.C. Cinema School in 1997, he wrote and directed the movies Flock of Dodos: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Circus, and Sizzle: A Global Warming Comedy. His new book is Don’t Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style.

In this interview with D.J. Grothe, Randy Olson discusses his background as a Harvard-trained scientist and tenured professor and why he changed careers to become a filmmaker. He explains the differences between science education and science communication. He recounts the social changes, beginning in the 1980’s, that have harmed science education and the communication of science to the public. He describes the ways that filmmaking is ideal for public science advocacy, and how his films, such as Flock of Dodos, have unexpectedly led to further public engagement with the scientific community. He emphasizes the role of storytelling as the means to best communicate science to the public, and describes how scientific papers are like screenplays.

He talks about the Daily Show and the Colbert Report as examples of how serious issues, including scientific controversies, can be communicated to the public in entertaining and engaging ways. He talks about how Stephen J. Gould and Carl Sagan exemplified ways to avoid being “such a scientist,” by arousing interest and by being likable. He addresses the stereotypes of scientists as being humorless, stuffy and too literal. He describes the reaction his book has received from the science community. He criticizes the National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science for their disinterest in science activism. He contrasts the community of scientists with other professional learned societies, such as within law or medicine. He examines the responsibility of the public to learn science even despite how effective scientists are at communicating it. And he explores the role of increasingly mainstream anti-science movements in the public’s misunderstanding of climate research, evolution, and vaccinations.

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/randy_olson_dont_be_such_a_scientist

[ Edited: 07 December 2009 04:42 PM by Thomas Donnelly ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 December 2009 12:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  695
Joined  2007-10-14

`
Haven’t listened to the podcast yet, but I love Olson :)

for anyone who hasn’t seen “Flock of Dodos” yet, do.  It’s interesting/entertaining and refreshingly lacking in stridency…....oh, and his mother, Muffy Moose stars in it! (yes, that’s actually the name she goes by:)  she even has a website:

Muffy Moose Memo

`

 Signature 

‘we are so fundamentally constituted of desire that we go on hearing music…...even though we know the band is gone and the stage is silent’

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 December 2009 11:20 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2422
Joined  2007-09-03
Thomas Donnelly - 05 December 2009 07:37 PM


http://www.pointofinqury.org/randy_olson_dont_be_such_a_scientist

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/randy_olson_dont_be_such_a_scientist/

typo in URL

I agree with Axegrrl—we are getting this book for Xmas.
Chris Mooney mentioned it in his interview also “sorry am I making myself clear” or something like that…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 December 2009 07:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  731
Joined  2007-06-20

I haven’t seen or read any of Olson’s work yet but I have heard him interviewed several times now.  Maybe I’m exceptionally thick but I just don’t get him.  His thing seems to be that some ways of communicating are more effective than others and we’ll never get through to creationists, climate change deniers, anti-science forces, etc. by hitting them over the head with arrogant science messages.  And how does he communicate this?  With arrogant communications theory messages!  He seems to be hitting scientists over the head with how poorly they are communicating in exactly the same way as he is railing against.  Maybe that’s an intentional technique?  Maybe it’s just me.

 Signature 

PC

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 December 2009 07:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2009-11-05

Anyone ever try Toastmasters Speaking clubs? There are many throughout the world.

I met my wife in Toastmasters 35 years ago and sure recommend it for teaching people how to communicate better. (Check out Toastmasters.org to find a club near you.)

I sure wish more people were more at ease with public speaking, with making their points in a friendly fashion, but also were more able to be more forceful as needed.

I’m not sure whether Groethe has ever had scientists/Toastmasters on his excellent show, but he may want to think about it. I’d imagine at least some of the people on his show were in Toastmasters at one time.

Yours,

Caleb

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2009 04:00 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2422
Joined  2007-09-03
Thomas Donnelly - 05 December 2009 07:37 PM

..... He addresses the stereotypes of scientists as being humorless, stuffy and too literal.

As I listened to the interview, I was struck by the example of Richard Feynman.  Feynman stated emphatically that a commitment to truth was essential and that scientists needed to bend over backwards to look for gaps in the data or in their logic.  So in this way he was the “bad example” Randy Olsen is using.  On the other hand, he was an enthusiast who COULD tell a story, hook the audience, and communicate.  He dominated the Challenger commission, and gave many clear and educational public lectures as well as lectures in teaching.  His 1974 commencement address at Caltech is one of the few quoted commencement addresses you will come across.

So Randy is not 100% correct—- you do not have to choose between being a “scientist” and a “communicator”—some are both. But few of us are so gifted.

Carl Sagan is another…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 December 2009 08:37 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  115
Joined  2007-12-09

Listened to this one today while on the road - what Olson says parallels my own experience in several fields.  Technical knowledge is often wasted, or at least used very ineffectively, when it isn’t communicated well to the lay audiences who either need to use it or foot the bill for further research, etc.

Surely this is all the more so in the cases of climate change and anti-science religious propaganda, in which well-organized and wealthy institutions have incentive to actively suppress or distort the truth. 
Not that those matters are of any concern to humanity, of course. gulp

Looking forward to seeing Mr. Olson’s movies and reading his book!

I see that netflix has Dodos, but not Sizzle.

 Signature 

Brad

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 December 2009 10:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2274
Joined  2007-07-05

Flock of Dodos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czo56z1C1nA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBT-nsnFAuA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Qwy8gsD4h0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MspFyY3lqzw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5ohubSxytM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzJKbZYGrr8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1X7Uvj7UAo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAwTxpk9oBY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogzia78S6h8

psik

 Signature 

Fiziks is Fundamental

Profile