I think the issue of assigning superstitious explanations to natural disasters is more general than Pat Robertson.
A Headline in the paper edition of USA Today this week {could not find the corresponding online article} was “Haiti needs Help and Prayers”. I absolutely support CFI’s effort to send them 100% help.
[ In Today’sNY TImes Gail Collins leads off her column by discussing Mr. Robertson]:
A spokesman, Chris Roslan explained that all Mr. Robertson was saying is that Haiti is cursed. I hope that clears everything up.
But on Wednesday when the NY Times first reported the story (on page A12 rather than A1!) the online story leads off with
[A fierce earthquake struck Haiti late Tuesday afternoon, causing a crowded hospital to collapse, leveling countless shantytown dwellings and bringing even more suffering to a nation that was already the hemisphere’s poorest and most disaster-prone.]
The paper edition actually starts
A fierce earthquake struck the star-crossed country of Haiti late Tuesday afternoon, causing a crowded hospital to collapse…
The “star-crossed” (which was edited out in on-line edition) is [ according to Wikipedia] astrological in origin {best known for a line in Shakespeare’s Romeo&Juliet;} and totally inappropriate in objectively reporting an earthquake.
I was struck by this term at the time, and was surprised when it didn’t appear in the online version…
