Bob Carroll - Defining Skepticism
Posted: 16 April 2010 10:12 AM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  170
Joined  2009-06-02

Dr. Robert Todd Carroll is a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, and author of The Skeptic’s Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions. He is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Sacramento City College, where he taught Logic and Critical Reasoning, Critical Thinking about the Paranormal, Law, Justice and Punishment, and World Religions. He is also author of the textbook Becoming a Critical Thinker.

Bob is the creator of the popular website Skepdic.com, which features numerous essays and book reviews, and the Skeptimedia blog where he provides a commentary of media coverage of pseudoscience and the paranormal. But the focus of the site is the original online version of the Skeptic’s Dictionary, containing hundreds of entries on topics ranging from “abracadabra to zombies”. This is the resource for defining skepticism.

In this episode, Karen Stollznow talks with Bob about the importance of defining the topics of which we are skeptical. They discuss the inadequacies of existing definitions of paranormal and pseudoscientific subjects, and why it is necessary to counter uncritical bias with explanations that are skeptical. However, the damning evidence (or lack-thereof) usually speaks for itself.

Bob reveals the top searches to his site, uncovering the themes that should be of particular concern to skeptics. He explains that his online book is reader-driven, and that user feedback and assistance has molded the shape of this dynamic resource. Even with 600 current entries in this encyclopedia-like dictionary, this is a work-in-progress that will never be finished.

Bob discusses skeptical activism, becoming a skeptic, and how to invent your own pseudoscience to learn critical thinking. As a life-long teacher of this topic, Bob explains that critical thinking needs to be taught, but also needs to be learned critically. We discuss how much critical thinking can or should be taught, and how much is a process of self-learning.

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/bob_carroll_defining_skepticism/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 April 2010 10:02 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7716
Joined  2008-04-11

I did like this podcast, having your students invent their own pseudoscience is genius. I will have to look for his book in the big box store!!

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 April 2010 07:34 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  15752
Joined  2006-02-14

Carroll is a giant in the skeptical movement; his Skepdic is a real reference-point around the world. I think actually one of the best things about it is how little its entries seem “biased” towards the skeptical point of view. The ones I’m familiar with seem to bend over backwards to make both sides of the case.

And of course one of the best things about them is the long list of links at the bottom.

It’s one of the first places I’ll go to research anything of a skeptical nature.

Great to have him on the show, and I thought the interview was excellent.

 Signature 

Doug

-:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:-

El sueño de la razón produce monstruos

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 April 2010 09:13 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7716
Joined  2008-04-11
dougsmith - 18 April 2010 07:34 AM

Carroll is a giant in the skeptical movement; his Skepdic is a real reference-point around the world.

Thanks for the tip Doug, I’d never heard of him. I will check out his web site. I will have to look out for his lectures, he is near me.

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 April 2010 04:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2423
Joined  2007-09-03

This was a delightful interview, Karen S. did a great job with Bob Carroll. I also liked the “make your own pseudoscience” idea—- someone chose “color therapy” (music therapy, aromatherapy—why not) and it turned out this was a real “therapy”....

Sounds like a good example of [ Poe’s Law] —I don’t know how you look things up online in the Skeptic’s Dictionary but this seems like a good one.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 April 2010 09:06 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  115
Joined  2007-12-09

I agree with everyone above that having students invent their own pseudoscience is simply a wonderful teaching tool.
What could better prepare a young person for evaluating nonsense as well as to help them remember the things that should raise red flags and their eyebrows?

But the reason I wanted to post is to thank Mr. Carroll for mentioning humility as being a key component of healthy skepticism and critical thinking.  To me, that virtue and element of wisdom is almost the very foundation of true critical thinking and of skillfully living in the world.
If we fail to appreciate how we, that is “I,” can be and not infrequently are, fooled by others and even more importantly, how we can fool ourselves, we’re not fundamentally more rational than those whom we criticize for their deities and other forms of credulity.

In my view, a key project for skeptics and humanists is to “take back,” so to speak, the mantle of humility from religionists -  particularly Christians and Muslims, who make much of their “humility.”
But the humility of a true critical thinker stands in stark contrast to the faux humility of religionists, who are really only “humble before God” -  a stance which allows them to be utterly pious, certain, and self-righteous regarding their unjustifiable supernatural beliefs, dangerous dogmas, and consequent behaviors.
In other words, for one very clear example, “humble believers” can become suicide bombers and the like - people whose certainty in their beliefs justifies for them the murder and suffering of others.

 Signature 

Brad

Profile