Well that’s the funny thing, to me it looks like it’s obviously correct in a way.
Just the simple fact that I observe myriad thins around me, including our discussion, shows that MN is incorrect. What it at most shows is that we do not understand in any reasonable way why things exist at all (why is there something, rather than nothing?). But that things exist is clear.
The thing is it seems these rules can’t be out there objectively in the universe. All that is out there is the parts. It seems we must make the rules up.
Can you show me the exact place where the shoulder ends, and your arm begins? Does it follow that your arm does not exist at all?
The only kind of rule in this respect is how we match our language on reality (what is a heap?), but not that things exist or not.
PS German wheat beer exists. You obviously enjoyed it. Did this beer not exist? And your enjoyance? (Is that english?).