Is there any difference between weak atheism and agnostic atheism?
To me it goes like this:
Weak atheists don’t believe in God.
Strong atheists believe there is no God.
Atheist refers to belief, agnostic to knowledge so agnostic atheists can be either really.
For example I am an agnostic strong atheist. I believe there is no God - as a provisional position until I see sufficient strong evidence to the contrary. It gives me a hypothesis to work from.
Yeah, agnostics are so STUPID they need atheists to label them and tell them what to think.
You think words are supposed to define people’s states of mind. I specify the states of mind then use the words as LABELS for those states. I don’t let labels tell me what to think and call myself.
Atheist == believes there is no God
Agnostic == does no know and has not encountered sufficient evidence about the existence of God or lack thereof.
Strong Agnostic == kills atheists that call agnostics “weak atheists” That is nothing but political propaganda word game bullshit.
Theist = someone that believes in some kind of God.
I never heard this atheist means “not a theist” crap until I started using the internet. This New Atheism has just gone into a mind game propaganda phase and expect agnostics to be stupid. Like letting atheists tell us what to think is better than letting theists tell us what to think.