James Randi and D.J. Grothe - Amaz!ng Skepticism
Posted: 27 November 2010 12:27 PM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  170
Joined  2009-06-02

This week is a special episode featuring interviews with two guests, James Randi and D.J. Grothe.

James Randi is a world-renowned magician and the modern-day Houdini of skepticism. He is the author of numerous books, including Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns and Other Delusions and the forthcoming A Magician in the Laboratory. He is the founder and Chairman of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF). This interview was recorded live at The Amaz!ng Meeting 8 in Las Vegas, 2010.

In this interview with Karen Stollznow, Randi reflects on his life’s work. He speaks about his organization and his role as a central figure in skepticism. He also talks about the JREF’s One Million Dollar Challenge, claims he’d like to test, and Sylvia Browne’s infamous reluctance to be tested, despite accepting the challenge.

More recently, Karen spoke with D.J. Grothe, President of the JREF and Host of the podcast For Good Reason. Grothe is the former Vice President for Outreach at the Center for Inquiry, and of course, the former Host of Point of Inquiry.

Grothe speaks about the JREF’s mission, and the greatest successes and challenges of the organization. He discusses his plans to “put the ‘E’ into the JREF” by focusing on education, and talks about his tireless work in skeptical outreach and activism.

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/james_randi_and_d.j._grothe_amazng_skepticism/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 November 2010 02:59 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Jr. Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2010-05-08

So now we know where D.J. is.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 November 2010 05:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7665
Joined  2008-04-11

Nice podcast. Thanks! It is always great to hear from DJ and Randi!

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 December 2010 11:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  6
Joined  2008-08-30

Perhaps one indication of the liberal bias of this site is the knee-jerk attitude toward the the likes of Ayn Rand, as well as Friedrich Nietzsche.  Given the general position and stated purpose of PoI, I’d be very interested in a reasoned dialog about these influential thinkers, whom some take very seriously.  It might inject some fresh vitality, not that I’m suggesting any is needed.

Here’s a topic: Ayn Rand vs. Friedrich Nietzsche…discuss.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 December 2010 01:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2010-12-02
xtroKEM - 01 December 2010 11:50 AM

... whom some take very seriously.

Yeah, that’s obviously a seal of quality. Or maybe it’s not?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 December 2010 01:46 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  6
Joined  2008-08-30

Well, make up your mind.

Meanwhile,  remember this golden moment?  http://www.pointofinquiry.org/peter_h_gilmore_science_and_satanism/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 December 2010 03:24 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7665
Joined  2008-04-11

What makes you think that any opinions on Rand or Nietzsche are ‘kneejerk’? They seem to present their cases in a well thought out manner. Which threads are you referencing?

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 December 2010 03:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2010-12-02
xtroKEM - 02 December 2010 01:46 PM

Well, make up your mind.

Oh, I have. One of the statements was ironic. Guess which one.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 December 2010 04:44 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  6
Joined  2008-08-30

asanta, I agree about Rand and Nietzsche…in fact, that was my point.

D.J. ended this interview by tossing a scornful reference to both, without backing up his opinion.  It’s a commonplace, of course, and never challenged, it seems.  I’ve heard Paul Kurtz, Christopher Hitchens and others make similar comments about Rand, contemptuously, and always unexplained.  I’d like there to be some genuine inquiry; why is Rand not a suitable, serious topic for this forum?  At least as much as Satanism?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 December 2010 10:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7665
Joined  2008-04-11
xtroKEM - 02 December 2010 04:44 PM

asanta, I agree about Rand and Nietzsche…in fact, that was my point.

D.J. ended this interview by tossing a scornful reference to both, without backing up his opinion.  It’s a commonplace, of course, and never challenged, it seems.  I’ve heard Paul Kurtz, Christopher Hitchens and others make similar comments about Rand, contemptuously, and always unexplained.  I’d like there to be some genuine inquiry; why is Rand not a suitable, serious topic for this forum?  At least as much as Satanism?

Sorry, my bad..I thought you were referring to a thread here and not a podcast. I will have to go back and listen to the podcast again.  There are some in-depth discussions here about Rand and you could probably find something on Nietzsche.

 Signature 

Church; where sheep congregate to worship a zombie on a stick that turns into a cracker on Sundays…

Profile