Basically I liked qutsemnie’s remarks. I don’t make your connection to modifying qutsemnie’s post.
You said you come to a different conclusion than qutsemnie’s remarks but I don’t see how-given what you stated.
I think the brain in the vat bit takes this discussion out of bounds for practical purposes. But that’s me. Please carry on.
qutsemnie said:
the only inevitable conclusion is that we know nothing of physical existence (or lack thereof) and only believe things exist. But, this seems like an impractical statement.
I do not come to the conclusion that the statement is impractical, but rather that the question of physical existence is. We can not know if a god exists, but so what? The brain in a vat/soccer ball example was just to illustrate that.
