5 of 8
5
Physics by socratus (Merged)
Posted: 26 April 2011 03:16 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 61 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1423
Joined  2010-04-22
socratus - 25 April 2011 06:53 AM

- Occam’s Razor and the Scheme of Universe.
But if I were a physicist I would say that 2D must have
some physical parameters like: volume (V), temperature (T)
and density (P). Yes, it seems the idea is right.
Then, volume (V) is zero,
temperature (T) is zero
but . . but density (P) cannot be zero if 2D is a real space
then its density can approximately be zero.

No, I don’t think so. In 2D space, you’re only using 2 dimensions. A circle (by definition, 2D anyway; 3D is a sphere) does not have zero volume unless it’s radius is zero, making it a point.

 Signature 

“All musicians are subconsciously mathematicians.”

- Thelonious Monk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2011 01:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 62 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6159
Joined  2009-02-26
TromboneAndrew - 26 April 2011 03:16 AM
socratus - 25 April 2011 06:53 AM

- Occam’s Razor and the Scheme of Universe.
But if I were a physicist I would say that 2D must have
some physical parameters like: volume (V), temperature (T)
and density (P). Yes, it seems the idea is right.
Then, volume (V) is zero,
temperature (T) is zero
but . . but density (P) cannot be zero if 2D is a real space
then its density can approximately be zero.

No, I don’t think so. In 2D space, you’re only using 2 dimensions. A circle (by definition, 2D anyway; 3D is a sphere) does not have zero volume unless it’s radius is zero, making it a point.

Is “area” the same as “volume?”

 Signature 

Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind.
W4U

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 April 2011 02:43 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 63 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1423
Joined  2010-04-22
Write4U - 26 April 2011 01:36 PM

No, I don’t think so. In 2D space, you’re only using 2 dimensions. A circle (by definition, 2D anyway; 3D is a sphere) does not have zero volume unless it’s radius is zero, making it a point.

Is “area” the same as “volume?”

Good point. I’m confusing terminology. A circle has area, a sphere has volume.

And no, not exactly; they’re essentially the same, except what area measures in 2D volume measures in 3D.

 Signature 

“All musicians are subconsciously mathematicians.”

- Thelonious Monk

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 April 2011 06:03 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 64 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

Where is 2D and 3D in my scheme?
In beginning I have 2D surface.
2D surface is flat homogenous infinite Pseudo Euclidian space.
In this space dark – virtual particles exist.
From these dark – virtual particles stars were formatted.
These stars (3D) exist in infinite Pseudo Euclidian space.
All billions and billions Galaxies exist in this
infinite Pseudo Euclidian space.
# Small example.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoaOHvy5AcA&feature=related

==========.

 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 May 2011 10:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 65 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

Occam’s Razor and the conception of ‘Time’.
( According to SRT , QED and GRT. )
=====..
1.
In his Miracle 1905 Einstein wrote the paper:
“ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT).
He wrote about moving of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ (!)
It means he wrote about particles like quantum of light, electron. (!)
This movement is going in minus 4D continuum.
Only quantum of light can move with speed c=1 and in this
movement his Time is infinite.
Then the minus 4D continuum must be infinite too.(!)
Later the theory says that something happens and photon’s
Infinite Time changes to a relative according to the Lorentz
transformations.
2.
According to QED when electron interacts with Vacuum
all his physical parameters become infinite.
But he cannot die. This is forbidden by
‘ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass‘.
How is possible to understand this situation?
It can only mean that electron’s own Time becomes infinite too.
So, it is possible that before he had an another Time.
If all electron’s physical parameters become infinite it means
that vacuum must be infinite too. (!)
If minus 4D continuum and Vacuum are both infinite then,
maybe, they are both one and the same reference frame. (!)
==.
My conclusion:
All ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ have two kinds of Time:
Infinite and relative.
P.S.
In 1915 Einstein wrote GRT.
According to GRT the Time depends on gravity mass and gravity speed.
Every planet says that this fact is true.
=========.
Israel Socratus.

=========..

 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 May 2011 06:58 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 66 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

SRT: what is it about?
1.
One of Einstein’s postulate says that particle – quantum of light-
moves in a straight line with constant speed c=1 in the vacuum.
So, in SRT we have one reference frame and it is vacuum.
But because Einstein took Time as a length (1 sec= 299,792,458 m)
Minkowski decided to take this time as a fourth coordinate
and created his minus 4D continuum. And we lost the direction.
But the root of the SR theory is the postulate:
constant and independence speed of quantum of light in the vacuum.
2.
The other Einstein’s SRT postulate says that movement is relative
conception. The name of Einstein’s SRT is :
“ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT).
Einstein wrote about moving of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ (!)
It means he wrote about particles like quantum of light, electron. (!)
And then this other Einstein’s SRT postulate must be understand
as:  ‘every speed, even the speed of quantum of light is relative.’
It means that quantum of light in a vacuum can have
two kinds of motions: constant and relative.
3
SRT is theory about relativity of every particle’s speed,
including the motion of particle - quantum of light. (!)
SRT explains only the behavior of Quantum of Light (!)
So, in my opinion the essence of Einstein’s SRT is hidden
in the questions:
a)
What will be happen if the particle – quantum of light – changes
its constant and straight movement in the vacuum?
b)
How can quantum of light change his movement?
=========.
All the best.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==============..

 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 May 2011 08:59 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 67 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

What is a vacuum ?

The empty space between stars ( Galaxies )
Is this space really empty?
# The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe
is very small (the average density of all substance in the
Universe is approximately p=10^-30 g/sm^3) and therefore
physicists invented an abstract ‘dark matter and dark energy’.
They say: ‘ 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.’
And nobody knows what it is.
Question:
How can the 90% or more of the Hidden ( dark ) matter in
the Universe create the few % of the Visible matter ?
========================== . .
Question:  what is Vacuum?
# ” The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, 
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
  / Paul Dirac ./
# “Remember gentlemen, we have not proven
the aether does not exist, we have only proven we do not
need it (for mathematical purposes)”..
  / Einstein’s famous University of Leyden lecture
of May 5, 1920./
# Herman Minkowski said about his minus 4D
spacetime continuum:
“ Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself,
are doomed to fade away into mere shadows,
and only a kind of union of the two will
preserve an independent reality.”
Question. What is the “a kind of union of the two “?
Nobody knows what really Minkowski space is .
# In Wikipedia we can read:
“ Unfortunately neither the concept of space nor of time is well defined,
resulting in a dilemma. If we don’t know the character of time nor of space,
how can we characterize either? “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
# “Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,”
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
===== . .
  Where is hidden Vacuum?
  Vacuum is hidden in every theory.
1.
Thermodynamics needs the Void/ Emptiness/ Vacuum.
2.
Maxwell electrodynamics needs the Void/ Emptiness/ Vacuum.
3.
SRT needs the Void/ Emptiness/ Vacuum.
4
GRT needs the Void/ Emptiness/ Vacuum.
5.
Atom heeds the Void/ Emptiness/ Vacuum.
6.
Outer space needs the Void/ Emptiness/ Vacuum.
7.
Religion doesn’t exist without the Void / Emptiness.
====.
The Vacuum is Source of the Universe
The Vacuum is Source of Consciousness. 
The Vacuum is Fundamental Theory 0f Existence.
=========.
P.S.
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum,
that endless infinite void.
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything
! The Universe is Two- Measured World.
Next to Material-Gravity World the Vacuum World exists too.
============.
Socratus.
==================================..

 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 May 2011 10:18 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 68 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

The discovery of the electron spin
    / S.A. Goudsmit /

And that was it: the spin; thus is was discovered, in that manner.
Of course we told Ehrenfest about it and then summer was over
and I went again to Amsterdam and various episodes followed.
Naturally, I found it wonderful, because in the formalism which
I knew it fitted perfectly. And the rigorous physics behind it
I did not fathom. But Uhlenbeck, being a good physicist, started
to think about it. ...... “A charge that rotates”......? He claims that he
then went to Lorentz and that Lorentz replied: “Yes, that is very
difficult because it causes the self energy of the electron to be wrong”.

And Uhlenbeck also tells you that ........
We had just written a short article in German and given to
Ehrenfest, who wanted to send it to “Naturwissenschaften”.
Now it is being told that Uhlenbeck got frightened, went to
Ehrenfest and said:
“Don’t send it off, because it probably is wrong;
it is impossible,
one cannot have an electron that rotates at such high speed and
has the right moment”. And Ehrenfest replied:
“It is too late, I have sent it off already”.
But I do not remember the event, I never had the idea that is was
wrong because I did not know enough. The one thing I remember
is that Ehrenfest said to me:
“Well, that is a nice idea, though it may be wrong.
But you don’t yet have a reputation, so you have nothing to lose”.
That is the only thing I remember.
http://www.lorentz.leidenuniv.nl/history/spin/goudsmit.html
======================…
“ . . . . .  it is impossible,
one cannot have an electron that rotates at such high speed
and has the right moment”.   
/ S.A. Goudsmit /
==.
1.
Do we have another way to explain the high speed of rotation
( frequency) of elementary particles?
2.
And if it is possible (!) . . . because it ‘has the right moment’ . . .
then . . . the constant speed c=1 of quantum of light is minimal.
And we have theory . . .  theory of ‘ Tachyon.’
===.
S.

 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 May 2011 07:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 69 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

Unified Field Theory
/ By Tim Joseph /


In the beginning there was Aristotle,
And objects at rest tended to remain at rest,
And objects in motion tended to come to rest,
And soon everything was at rest,
And God saw that it was boring.

Then God created Newton,
And objects at rest tended to remain at rest,
But objects in motion tended to remain in motion,
And energy was conserved and momentum
was conserved and matter was conserved,
And God saw that it was conservative.

Then God created Einstein,
And everything was relative,
And fast things became short,
And straight things became curved,
And the universe was filled with inertial frames,
And God saw that it was relatively general,
but some of it was especially relative.

Then God created Bohr,
And there was the principle,
And the principle was quantum,
And all things were quantified,
But some things were still relative,
And God saw that it was confusing.

Then God was going to create Furgeson,
And Furgeson would have unified,
And he would have fielded a theory,
And all would have been one,
But it was the seventh day,
And God rested,
And objects at rest tend to remain at rest.

http://www.randomjoke.com/funny/fieldtheory.php
=================== .

 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 May 2011 08:09 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 70 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3121
Joined  2008-04-07

That’s cool, socratus.

 Signature 

Turn off Fox News - Bad News For America
(Atheists are myth understood)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 July 2011 07:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 71 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  134
Joined  2010-12-31

In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God.
  /  John 1:1 /
# In the beginning was the Word.
And the Word was written by formula: T = - 273,16= 0K.
T = 0K is an Absolute Reference frame.
Scientists call this Absolute Reference frame as an Aether (Vacuum).
But if in the beginning was T = 0K, can the T=0K take the functions of God?
Can T = 0K be an Absolute God?
To answer to this question we need to ask:
‘ Which kind of particles can exist in this Absolute Reference frame: T=0K?
# And then “God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light.”
  / Genesis 1:3   /
# My conclusion:
The secret of God and Existence is hidden
  in the ‘ Theory of Vacuum and Light Quanta ‘.
========.
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==========..

Image Attachments
religion-symbols.jpg
 Signature 

The secret of God, Soul and Existence is hidden
in ‘ Vacuum and Quantum of Light Theories ’.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 July 2011 11:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 72 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6159
Joined  2009-02-26

Or not.

 Signature 

Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind.
W4U

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 July 2011 02:05 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 73 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  15435
Joined  2006-02-14
socratus - 30 July 2011 11:10 AM

In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God
  / John 1:1 /
# In the beginning was the Word
And the Word was written by formula: T = - 273,16= 0K.
T = 0K is an Absolute Reference frame
Scientists call this Absolute Reference frame ‘ Vacuum’
But if in the beginning was the Absolute Infinite T = 0K,
can the T=0K take the functions of God?
Can T = 0K be an Absolute God?
To answer to this question we need to ask:
‘ Which kind of particles can exist in this
Absolute Reference frame: T=0K?
# And then ” God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light”
    / Genesis 1:3 /
# My conclusion:
The secret of God and Existence is hidden
  in the ‘ Theory of Vacuum and Light Quanta ‘
=.
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
=.

Socratus please do not put identical posts in different threads; it’s against the rules. I’ve merged two of your threads because they are virtually the same. Thanks.

 Signature 

Doug

-:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:-

El sueño de la razón produce monstruos

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 July 2011 05:48 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 74 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5551
Joined  2010-06-16

But Doug, posts #71 and #72 are essentially identical.  How about just deleting at least one of them?

Occam

 Signature 

Succinctness, clarity’s core.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 July 2011 06:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 75 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  15435
Joined  2006-02-14
Occam. - 30 July 2011 05:48 PM

But Doug, posts #71 and #72 are essentially identical.  How about just deleting at least one of them?

Occam

Done.

 Signature 

Doug

-:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:- -:—:-

El sueño de la razón produce monstruos

Profile
 
 
   
5 of 8
5