So you are using logic to disprove logic?
But the heart of the matter is unaddressed:
I didn’t ask how other people/religions have defined god. I asked how have you defined god? And how can you be so certain of your definition that god is somehow now a viable option? You have defined him into possible existence based on absolutely nothing. Why is the question of god’s existence even postulated on the first place? On what grounds?
I didn’t invent the language dude. Unless I see a reason to reject the common dictionary definition I go with the flow. However no one has proven any god exists by any definition to my satisfaction.
But atheists have not proven the nonexistence of any god to my satisfaction either.
You have defined him into possible existence based on absolutely nothing.
It is not my fault that atheists do not regard the I DON’T KNOW STATE as LOGICAL.
Where did you get that him? Who is defining now? Atheists use the Euro-Christian paradigm to argue about God.
It is not my fault that atheists presume to tell other people what to think and then CLAIM it is LOGICAL.
I am not responsible for the delusions of atheists. Many times atheists behave as though the primary purpose of science is to beat on religion. Look at some atheist sites and see how often they mention Darwin versus Newton.