and my ( dear ) friend what solid, verifialbe (sic) and tangible explanation was used in this famous conversation of your napoleon and mr.such and such ?
First off, we are not friends and we are certainly not dear friends. As for verifiable information you should read a few astronomy and physics books, or at least just the link I provided. LaPlace’s ideas have been confirmed time and again through advances in our knowledge of the universe and how it operates. His point was there is no need for a god anywhere in the mathematics. You assume there is a god then in your circular reasoning you claim victory because no one can absolutely prove alternative ideas. When it comes to science nothing is ever proven with certainty, but we can get very, very close; close enough that science works, otherwise we could not have this conversation over the internet.
Religious ideas? They’ve contributed nothing to our knowledge. Quite the opposite. Religious thinking has held back and even destroyed our knowledge over the millennia.
Nothing any of use posts here will change your thinking. You’re just the latest theist to come here and post out of ignorance, and you won’t be the last.
I expect you to come back with more drivel, but at least try to be civil about it and stop with the condescension.