Bigfoot: Shoot First and Protect the Species Later?
Posted: 28 May 2018 04:44 PM   [ Ignore ]
Jr. Member
Rank
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2018-05-25

What does everyone think about the kill/no-kill debate when it comes to Sasquatch?

Do we definitively NEED to kill one so that we can establish protective legislation… or would it be essentially murder since they might actually be a type of human. I’ve heard so many stories about the hunters out in the bush who have pointed their weapon at a creature, but stopped because it had way too many human-like features.

And honestly, I don’t know if anyone could ever be ready for this type of moment. This account from Bigfoot Base talks about a Michigan Hunter who was 15 yards away from one of these things. He was so freaked out that he couldn’t even move if he wanted to shoot the creature. Thankfully, it just kept walking.

Skamania County in Washington actually has a protective measure in place. Do we need more of these?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 May 2018 05:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  614
Joined  2016-10-10

We would need evidence they exist, first and foremost.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 May 2018 05:17 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  614
Joined  2016-10-10

I’ve heard so many stories about the hunters out in the bush who have pointed their weapon at a creature, but stopped because it had way too many human-like features.

lol smart move, you don’t want to light up your co-hoaxer.

Profile