CFI to HHS: Don’t Force Insurers to Pay for Acupuncture
April 5, 2012
The Center for Inquiry (CFI) today wrote to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking her to reject lobbying efforts to require health insurance providers and organizations to cover acupuncture, and instead base the government’s rules for health care coverage on science and reason.
As you might have already heard, the American Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (AAAOM) and other alternative medicine interest groups are attempting to persuade HHS to categorize acupuncture as an Essential Health Benefit (EHB) under the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This designation would require health insurance providers and organizations providing health care plans to cover the practice without a co-pay, deductible, or additional insurance.
According to the Institute of Medicine, for a service to be eligible as an EHB, it must: (1) be safe, (2) be medically effective, (3) demonstrate meaningful improvement, (4) be a medical service, and (5) be cost effective.
As we write in our letter, acupuncture meets none of these five criteria.
Proponents of acupuncture repeatedly claim that acupuncture is a safe, efficacious, and cost effective complement to conventional medicine. However, such claims are unjustified, and rely on dubious and discredited research. In fact, an increasingly robust body of empirical evidence has shown that acupuncture is unproven, unscientific, and has no clinical value beyond a placebo effect. Medical interventions that perform no better than placebos should not be covered by the government. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not approve drugs as “safe and effective” when they perform no better than placebos. Similarly, HHS should not classify a procedure as an EHB when it provides no benefits beyond what could be expected from a placebo.
The adoption of acupuncture as an EHB would add significant costs to the United States' already overburdened health care system, and lower standards of medical training and treatment. It would also lend dangerous and undue authority to pseudoscience, ultimately degrading respect for science in the public realm.
We will let you know if and when we hear anything.
#1 jerrys on Thursday April 05, 2012 at 11:41am
I wonder if the Catholic Church will support this letter
#2 Pharmg697 (Guest) on Thursday April 05, 2012 at 4:50pm
Hello! defddee interesting defddee site! I’m really like it! Very, very defddee good!
#3 Pharmd712 (Guest) on Thursday April 05, 2012 at 4:50pm
Hello! ebdagcc interesting ebdagcc site! I’m really like it! Very, very ebdagcc good!
#4 Flandrii (Guest) on Thursday April 26, 2012 at 7:02am
Yes and no, depends on where you go. I had poor creidt and got accepted bymyself at one dealership and needed a co-signer for the other one, the one place I can suggest for you to try is Ford. Ford Motor Credit will take anyone, and once you have a car in your name make some payments on it and you can go ANYWHERE and trade it in for something else, thats what I did, I needed a co-signer though bc I hadnt had the car that long.
#5 Pharmb563 (Guest) on Thursday July 05, 2012 at 4:11pm
Hello! efaedab interesting efaedab site! I’m really like it! Very, very efaedab good!